Re: Fantasy hockey pet peeve
I don't mind this at all, it's pretty much standard operating procedure and as has already been discussed with good reason and to good effect, provided the explanation is realistic and factual and the other GM is looking to craft a trade that is potentially mutually beneficial to both teams. However, what I do mind is when I get a detailed trade analysis which clearly demonstrates how the guys' I'm being asked to move are crap and what is coming back is gold. Right. Unfortunately, I see lots of those, an awful lot of GM's feel they have win a trade big time or just not go there, mutually beneficial is not on their radar. It's just the way it is I guess, owners over value their assets and under value the other guys assets to try and manipulate you into making a good trade for them and a bad trade for you. It's just part of the game.
14 Team Roto; Keep 25; 12 F, 6 D, 2 G; 10 Farm; 5 Bench; 5 IR;
Salary Cap - 102.5 Mil
Scoring Cats: G, A, Pts, PIM, Hits, BS, SOG, F Points, D Points; Win+Ties+SO, GAA, SV%
Keepers
F: Aho, Larkin, DeBrincat, Vrana, Bennett, Scheifele, Kakko,Tolvanen, McBain,
D: Heiskanen, Fox, Toews, Lundqvist
G: Swayman, Andersen, Copley
Drops
F: Gaudreau, Terravainen, Puljujarvi, Kravstov, Zary
D: Brannstrom, Cernak, Alexeyev
G: Korpisalo, Merzlikins
FARM: Rossi, Berggren, Holtz, Savoie, Clarke, Tarasov, Wolf