SJ in 7. Pavelski is back.
Sharks in 4
Sharks in 5
Sharks in 6
Sharks in 7
Blues in 4
Blues in 5
Blues in 6
Blues in 7
Coin flip series I think but I’m pulling hard for Jumbo Joe so let’s go Sharks in 7.
SJ in 7. Pavelski is back.
"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen." - Sterling Archer
"Don't spray that urine on my sons window. If you want a dollar for doing nothing, walk to Canada." - Malory Archer
“Anyone who thinks the pen is mightier than the sword has not been stabbed with both.” - Lemony Snicket
My playoff bracket has boston vrs st louis in the finals, so i'll stick with the blues for the cash...
Sharks in 6
Set roster weekly in H2H (Mon to Sun) - 16 Teams - start 6F, 3D, and 1G per week - Keep 2
Points: 2 G / 2 A / 1 PPG / 1 PPA / 1 Hat Trick / 1 SHG / 1 SHA / 1 GWG - 3 Goalie Win / 2 Goalie Loss in SO or OT / 5 goalie SO
Forwards:
C. McDavid, N. Kucherov, R. O'Reilly, J. Schwartz, J. Toews, J. Huberdeau, T. Toffoli, M. Granlund
Defense:
B. Burns, J. Klingberg, R. Josi, J. Slavin
Goalie:
J. Binnington
IR (2 max):
I had St.Louis vs Columbus in the Cup. Will stick with the Blues in 7.
However I’d love to see Thornton raise the Stanley Cup.
Yahoo! 10 Team Keep 6, H2H - 1 win
G, A, SOG, PPP, FOW, H, B, Wins, GAA, Sv%, SHO
4 weekly goalie appearances minimum
2C, 2RW, 2LW, 1Ut, 4D, 3G, 6Bench, 2-I/R+, 1NA
C: Bennett
LW: E.Kane, Kaprizov
LW/C: Draisaitl, Stutzle
RW: Marner
RW/C: T.Thompson, Necas
RW/LW: Svechnikov
D: Dahlin, Bouchard, Sergachev, Gudas
G: Vasilevskiy , Skinner, Gustavsson
When I say nothing, I say everything. J.White
Tough not to cheer for Joe here, but I'd rather see Bozak and Steen play for a cup. Blues in 7
Well, ya gotta "hand" it to the Sharks for the OT win in Game 3.
"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen." - Sterling Archer
"Don't spray that urine on my sons window. If you want a dollar for doing nothing, walk to Canada." - Malory Archer
“Anyone who thinks the pen is mightier than the sword has not been stabbed with both.” - Lemony Snicket
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
Refs are really handling this playoffs poorly. I think we need to put two more on the ice.
Of course Meier gets a secondary assist on the overtime goal
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great newspaper headline.
I am now convinced that all men have an Attention Deficit Disorder. Unfortunately for the Blues, the refs were in sync with it.
This is an overtime of a playoff game game not an exhibition game. The players are working their asses off because they are so close to the Stanley Cup finals and the refs are day dreaming. Again, why are the 4 officials not watching where the play is happening? 4 officials. Lol. How can the NHL not be embarrassed? Why are these obvious mistakes not reviewable? Its on the NHL. Getting very hard to watch.
Three enormous calls all in favour of San Jose at crucial times. Crazy coincidence but you can’t blame people for thinking the league is trying to send off Jumbo with a Cup.
I think people need to start blaming the league for handicapping their refs.
Sharks vs Golden Knights - Refs cannot review a major penalty and they get the call wrong on a major penalty
Sharks vs Avs - Refs can review an offside and they originally got the call wrong, but were able to reverse it and get it right, even if it was by 1 mm.
Sharks vs Blues - Refs cannot review a hand-pass on a goal and the refs totally missed it and it ended up being the OT winner.
So in summary, the NHL needs to fix what can and cannot be review.
My suggested solution.
Expand what CAN be reviewed and minimize the amount of time that a review should take to like 60 seconds. If it is not blatantly obvious in 60 seconds, leave it to the refs original call.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a goal in the Bruins/Jackets series that was scored after the puck went into mesh above the glass. I'm not opposed to going the route of the NFL in which all scoring plays are reviewed as long as it is done in a quick manner like PH suggested (under 60 seconds). A blatantly obvious blown call by the refs should never result in a goal if we are able to use common sense.
Without me, it's only "aweso".