Martin Jones and Byfuglien for Brayden Point and Seth Jones?

[Hey Robbie]

I would be receiving Buff. My goaltending has been my weak link so far; would adding Martin Jones be worth anything? Brayden Point (or Namestnikov) have been good to me so far, but I feel like I should consider selling high on one of them. I would also like to reduce the variance in my games per week by not having three Tampa players and two Columbus D.

I have enough middling forwards that I don't lose much by giving up Point, true?

Keeper considerations are minor. Seth Jones or Namestnikov could be kept next year for a 10th round pick, Werenski for a 7th, Point in the 13th.

(Apologies for starting to post in another forum; I'm attempting to delete.)

[Belexus75]

if you receiving buff and M jones and you mostly concerned about this year...take it and run...

[Hey Robbie]

Thanks Belexus. Would it be better to send him Werenski or Seth Jones, in your opinion? Jones has really been stepping it up lately.

[Oakville Squires]

I would lean towards keeping Jones and moving Werenski but it is close

[Hey Robbie]

I would lean towards keeping Jones and moving Werenski but it is close

Sounds reasonable. Similar question with Point vs Namestnikov. Namestnikov seems to be geting the better PP time, but now that he's on the third line, Point seems to be in the better 5v5 situation. If Naestnikov has a decent chance to get back with Stamkos and Kucherov, I want to keep him. Namesnikov also has the advantage of being triple position eligible (C/LW/RW) while Point is center only.

[MZac]

I like keeping Jones for a 10th pick more than werenski for a 7th pick. Better value so id lean towards keeping Jones in this case.

[Hey Robbie]

I probably won't keep a D at all, but I like the idea of keeping Seth Jones.

I can't rep you right now; I will get you soon.

[HonkyTonkMan]

Because of your pool scoring, Jones.