Looking to potentially make an offer for Fowler or Vatanen

[Carlito99]

Hey everyone, due to my league settings, scheduling is huge and I'd like to acquire an Anaheim player... Probably Fowler or Vatanen (who would be the better option for this year??)

Would Ehrhoff for Fowler straight up be a good offer given my league settings? Or maybe make it a 2-2 trade by throwing in some forwards? Any suggestions appreciated, as I'd really like to grab an Anaheim player to cut down a little bit on the quantity of players benched

He has:

O'Reilly, Ryan, Hudler, T. Johnson, Vanek, Palat, Pacioretty, R. Johansen
Subban, Fowler, Campbell, Hamilton
Bishop, Ramo

Same question for Vatanen?? His owner's team is:

Hall, Dupuis, Simmonds, Eberle, Forsberg, Hartnell, Stastny
Green, Vatanen, Streit, Sekara
Rask, Howard, Jones

Thanks!

[deepsingh86]

I'd keep ehrhoff over both Anaheim dmen but if you absolutely have to, go after vatanen IMO.

[Rehdaun]

As invisible as Ehrhoff has been so far this I would rather have him other either ANA D. As deepsingh86 said, take Vatanen if you need to get one. I have no faith that Fowler will do anything this year.

[Carlito99]

Yeah? Hmm... Guess straight up is a no go then... But I just like Anaheim's schedule in my type of league where we don't start too many players each night, so it would probably get me more games played from those 2 D slots in the season.

If not straight up then, but what about some sort of 2-2... Ehrhoff/Lupul for Fowler/Vanek or something like that? Or Vatanen/Hartnell? Try to get an upgrade in forward if I'm downgrading in D (not necessarily those combinations, just examples)

But yea, it's not a "must", but was just thinking the Anaheim off day scheduling may help out a bit

[Dillweed]

Of the two, I'd go with Vatanen. Ernhoff straight up might be a starting point for discussions, but with his slow start I'm not sure the other GM will buy his name. Who knows though... worth a try. At the very least it gets the ball rolling.