Clarkson vs Eriksson
which 3rd liner would you rather own?
20 team salary cap league, and i am competing for the win
G/A/PPP/SHP/Hits/BLKs/PIMs/TOI-SH
i need to try and trade one away which one do you think will have a better year with those categories?
NFHA categories: G(25) A(25) PIM(3) Hits(2) Blocks(2) PPP(15) SHP(20) Goalie Stats: W(50) Sv(2) ShOu(100) OtL(10) ShL(10) L(-10) GA(-12)
Cold As Ice Dynasty H2H categories: G A PIM SOG PPP +/- HIT BLK WINS GAA SV% SHO
Starting Roster:
Center - Giroux, Krejci, W.Karlsson
Left Wing - Hall, Guentzel, Danault
Right Wing - Stone, R.Smith, Compher
Ultility Forward - Fast, Gaborik
Defense - Klingberg, Pietrangelo, Jones, C.Miller, Phanuef, E.Johnson
Goalie - Allen, R.Miller
Bench - M.Foligno, Sheahan, Laughton, Glendening, Djoos, Jensen, H.Fleury
Prospects - Kyrou, Andersson Hinostroza, Grundstrom, Roy, Timmins, Grzelcyk, Lauzon, Lindgren
Re: Clarkson vs Eriksson
Ok I'm gonna say something dumb.
Give me Clarkson.
I like him in that setup, and there's not the injury risk that Eriksson has. Hits and PIM Clarkson will be set. If he can even score 20 points this year, he'll have value. And if he can find his way back onto the PP he could go a bit higher in points. He's shown the ability to play on the PP and be productive there in the past, and it's not like anything else is working for the Leafs right now.
20 Team Dynasty (points per) - G (25, 50 for defense) A (25) PIM (3) PPP (15) SHP (25) OTG (15) GWG (25) HTr (50) SOW (75) HIT (1) BLK (2) W (50) SHO (100) OTL (10) GA (-15) SV (2) Use actual NHL salary
Start 12 F, 6 D, 1G weekly
F: Kucherov, Marchand, Barkov, Gaudreau, Laine, Aho, Dubois, Dadonov, Huberdeau, Trocheck, Bertuzzi, Beauvillier, Khaira, Grigorenko
D: Ekman-Larsson, Yandle, Edler, Pulock, Borowiecki, Weegar, Mike Reilly
G: Andersen, Hart
Farm: Boldy, Beckman, Wise, Mascherin, Kovalenko, Manukyan, Walker, Morozov, Shafigullin, Palmu, Tychonic, Zhuravlyov, Kesselring, Zamula, Lankinen, Sogaard, Ingram, Rybar
Re: Clarkson vs Eriksson
Love this post. "Gunna say something dumb" ... lolOriginally Posted by Fast Tony DeNiro
You convinced me. Another vote for Clarkson here!
Re: Clarkson vs Eriksson
I felt dumb for asking, but I felt the difference between the two wasn't that great either, thanks for the input! Clarkson has seemed to find his groove and could possibly have close to a 20 goal year imo.
NFHA categories: G(25) A(25) PIM(3) Hits(2) Blocks(2) PPP(15) SHP(20) Goalie Stats: W(50) Sv(2) ShOu(100) OtL(10) ShL(10) L(-10) GA(-12)
Cold As Ice Dynasty H2H categories: G A PIM SOG PPP +/- HIT BLK WINS GAA SV% SHO
Starting Roster:
Center - Giroux, Krejci, W.Karlsson
Left Wing - Hall, Guentzel, Danault
Right Wing - Stone, R.Smith, Compher
Ultility Forward - Fast, Gaborik
Defense - Klingberg, Pietrangelo, Jones, C.Miller, Phanuef, E.Johnson
Goalie - Allen, R.Miller
Bench - M.Foligno, Sheahan, Laughton, Glendening, Djoos, Jensen, H.Fleury
Prospects - Kyrou, Andersson Hinostroza, Grundstrom, Roy, Timmins, Grzelcyk, Lauzon, Lindgren
Re: Clarkson vs Eriksson
As easy as it's been to laugh at Clarksons salary and production over the past year I actually think he's the better choice to keep here. Eriksson will likely outscore DC by 10-15 points but he will be quite lacking in the "tough" categories.
Plus, Eriksson will likely get you a better return in a trade.
Re: Clarkson vs Eriksson
Eriksson is generally not good in multi-cat. Clarkson is basically the better of two bad options.
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote