Reply With QuoteI'd take a healthy Reimer over Halak right now. I think Halak gets his job back at some point but Reimer is the guy in TO. The only problem is the concussion issue and whether he can bounce back from it.
Halak or Reimer?
Team in sig, league is a keeper but we're only allowed to keep one goalie per year and Rinne has that sewn up, so this is essentially a move with only this season in mind.
I've got Halak, someone just dropped Reimer and I'm 1st in line for waiver claims. Do I drop Halak since Elliott seems to be playing his way into at least a timeshare in St. Louis?
Advice please, gents!
10 Team H2H ESPN Keeper - G, A, PIM, FOW, ATOI, SOG, HIT, BLK, DEF, STP, W, SO, SV, GAA, SV%
================================================== ===========================
Forwards: McDavid, Matthews, Ovechkin, Couture, Toews, Henrique, Perry, Perron, Maroon, Galchenyuk, Neal, R. Smith, Parise, Stastny, Konecny, Patrick
Defence: Ristolainen, Josi, Hamilton, Giordano, Fowler, Ekholm, Schultz
Goalies: Fleury, Lundqvist, Smith
IR: Crawford
I'd take a healthy Reimer over Halak right now. I think Halak gets his job back at some point but Reimer is the guy in TO. The only problem is the concussion issue and whether he can bounce back from it.
10 Team Yahoo H2H - Keep 5 - G,A,+/-,PPP,PIMS,HITS SOG,GWG/W,GAA,SV%,SO
C: Tavares, Pavelski, Fabbri, Matthews, Rakell,
LW: Landeskog, Sedin, Perron
RW: Kucherov, Oshie, Radulov, Backes
D: Subban, Petry, Gostisbehere, Green, Yandle, Werenski
G: Price, Talbot
Canadian Dad Blog - http://canadiandad.com
I'm a Leaf fan so take my advice for what it's worth. I would take Reimer over Halak as well. I have never been the biggest Halak fan myself. He is to inconsistent for me. In years he has a good GAA his SV% is down and in years his SV% is up his GAA is down. He is only 26 but has never been able to put a full stellar year together,. I think he is over rated..
"My Name Is My Name" ~Marlo
"I'm just a Gangster I suppose and I want my fu***** corners"~ Barksdale
grammar Nazi
Noun
(slang, idiomatic) 1. A person who habitually corrects or criticizes the language usage of others, especially in situations where it is unnecessary, e.g. an informal conversation.
Notes: This behavior is almost always found in people with very low I.Q's, whom have a very low sense of self worth. Impotence is also commonly linked to Grammar Nazi's.
Posting Permissions