Originally Posted by
hank mooney
Definitely like Benn here--remember he's the guy the Stars actively chose, not Neal, as their golden boy. Again....BETTER potential than Neal in the Stars eyes, which is the most accurate measuring stick we poolies have to our disposal (Who would know more about a player than the organization that see him skate every day? They are both roughly the same age, same position, why else would the Stars choose to keep Benn over Neal, if he were not believed to be a better option??). He'll garner top PP time and numbers next year, if not later this year, and should be good for 70-80.