Is this a Horrible trade or what?

[Hawks1]

I cant say its vetoable necessarily(in terms of being horribly onesided) but man it doesnt make sense at all. Guess I'll leave that to the commish. But again Im not saying its vetoable

16teams h2h 6x4 w SOG

TeamA Trades RKesler & LSchenn

to

TeamB for: DGirardi & TThomas

Team A already has JQuick and Kippewr in net. But there C has raken a real hit as they really only have Zetts as being anything special.

The inly thing I can say is that maybe hes trying to move Kipper or Quick(he offered them to me.)

But still I shake my head at this deal.

[Rustyrug]

Like you say, maybe he has something else up his sleeve.

he must feel Thomas is a big upgrade over Quick or Kipper. So he gives up kesler for it.

Not as bad as you make it seem

[Hawks1]

Like you say, maybe he has something else up his sleeve.

he must feel Thomas is a big upgrade over Quick or Kipper. So he gives up kesler for it.

Not as bad as you make it seem

Just thought he gave up too much.

Part time G for a very solid 70pt + C

[dongjohnson]

Just thought he gave up too much.

Part time G for a very solid 70pt + C

I think you're looking at it wrong. 1)Quick could end up losing starts to Bernier in the near future so he wants another tender in case and 2)Thomas could be traded and wind up a full-time starter again. Plus even if he only plays 35-40 games, he'll post insane numbers while doing so. OTOH, Kesler's value should decline once Burrows returns. It's actually a fair deal.

[notoriusbug]

not vetoable

[Killer67]

I think it's a good trade and if anything, the guy is selling high on Thomas and buying low on Kesler. Thomas has looked great so far for the B's and not knowing the value of Goalies in your league, I could assume you start 2, he now has 3 good starters in his pen. You can bet as the season goes on and injuries happen, the value of those tenders will rise significantly.