Help me choose for next year - Stone/Batherson/Josi or Landerskog/Robertson/Q.Hughes?

[Ryan2359]

Help me choose for next year - Stone/Batherson/Josi or Landerskog/Robertson/Q.Hughes?

[Wotan]

The first package any day of the week.

I get that the players in the second one are younger on average, but you can't pass up on what currently is one of (if not THE) biggest difference maker on D in Josi.
Batherson is similar to Landeskog when it comes to multi cat coverage - he's just way younger.
Additionally you get two very strong RWs in Stone and Batherson and that's always much harder to find than quality LWs like Landeskog and Robertson.

[J0e Th0rnton]

The first package any day of the week.

I get that the players in the second one are younger on average, but you can't pass up on what currently is one of (if not THE) biggest difference maker on D in Josi.
Batherson is similar to Landeskog when it comes to multi cat coverage - he's just way younger.
Additionally you get two very strong RWs in Stone and Batherson and that's always much harder to find than quality LWs like Landeskog and Robertson.

I've found LW harder to come by this year myself.

In my 1 year league where we roster 3 c, 3lw, 3rw, 4d, quality left wingers seem to be in more demand among the buyers. In yahoo at least

[Wotan]

I've found LW harder to come by this year myself.

In my 1 year league where we roster 3 c, 3lw, 3rw, 4d, quality left wingers seem to be in more demand among the buyers. In yahoo at least

Interesting - it's probably a matter of the league settings then. I'm in a fantrax league, so position eligibilities may be different. But most importantly mine is a 24 teams league with 4 C, LW, RW each and 6 Ds, so we're looking at a very different set of relevant LWs/RWs respectively...

[Ryan2359]

The league does not have positional requirements for forwards. We just need 12 forwards and 6 dman so the LW, RW issue is not a concern.