Who to take from the triplets in Arizona?

[brother hood]

Standard 1 year, points only pool, no positional requirements. 2 pts/g, 1 pt/as.
In Arizona, the following three are available in my 14 team pool.

Here are their stats and my thoughts:
Dvorak 1.33 pts/gm, prorated for the rest of the season: 75 pts, first line PP, goal scorer on the line?
Garland, 1.33 75 pts, first PP, seen him play and he was excellent
Schmaltz 1.27 71 pts, first PP, don't know much about him so far

so, who in Dobberland can push me in the right direction. Right now it's Garland for me.
Thanks
Brohood

[am78]

I would take Dvorak personally but I don't see him as a 75 pt player...60-65 pt imo

[hockeyrobot]

Another vote for Dvorak and yes definitely in the 65 point range.

[brother hood]

I should have mentioned I used our scoring system to pro-rate out their points. Sounds like you guys prefer Dvorak over Garlander. Is DV more of a goal scorer, which is a big plus in our set up?

[Dover]

It’s Garland for me. I think he will have more goals than Dvorak at the end of the season. But it’s pretty close

[Wonko]

I am taking Garland here over Dvorak by a smidge.

[brother hood]

Thanks for all the input. Best of luck in your pools.

[Araziza]

If it’s points only and no position, I’d take Garland. Dvorak’s shooting percentage is 21% and his power play IPP is 100 percent. These are both going to regress. Garland’s ipp at all strengths is pretty appropriate and even a bit low for one of the team’s top players, and he shoots a ton, so the points should keep coming and possibly even rise a tiny bit. His shooting percentage is 12.5%, which is still a bit high but actually fairly in line with his historical numbers. I’d go Garland here.

[brother hood]

Thanks for the excellent analysis. I am going to go with Garland over Dvorak.

[Palefa]

I went through all this thinking two weeks ago and picked Garland as his numbers are sustainable compare to Dvorak for whom I suspect a small regression.