Yup, I understand this way of thinking. I am just saying from the very top management, I personally do not see this as wise use of draft capital.
Jared Goff, Carson Wentz, these guys didn't have great first years in the NFL... look at them now. I think Arizona should have been more patient.
My thought process is this:
You have an empty fridge (Which the Cardinals do) and you need food for the weekend. And your needs for the fridge are one some meat, some potatoes, some veggies and some dessert.
You have $20 to make the trip and get a good meal. You spend $18 dollars on some nice juicy steaks and then you have $2 dollars remaining to complete the meal with potatoes, veggies and dessert.
You get back to the camper and you find another $20 bill... so you head back to the store. You decide to spend $19 dollars on another pair of steaks even though the first ones have barely had time to marinate. And you have $1 dollar remaining to buy a chocolate bar for dessert on the way out.
When you get back to the camper you have a bunch of steaks to eat, (too much steak) and you have potato chips instead of real potatoes and a can of No-name beans and a chocolate bar for dessert.
Now there are several ways you could have had a much more delicious and complete steak supper, but you chose to spend majority of your capital on back to back trips on steak, leaving the rest of the meal as crap.
Sure in the Arizona, example, they had someone else running to the store each time... but the head of the household should have had a better idea of what he wanted for his supper and planned accordingly. They could have traded the first set of steaks for some other parts of the meal to make a more complete meal? Or they could have settled for the first steaks and used the second $20 to improve the other part of the meal. Especially when next years QB class for the draft is supposed to be significantly better than this years.