Reading these descriptions, he seems to me as if he were A.Mantha's second coming.. Same size, same shooter instincts - same talent? What's your best guess? Are the parallels I'm seeing for real?
24 team H2H dynasty, fantasy points, no cap
Skaters: G 4.5 (5 for Ds), A 3, PPG 1.5 (2 for Ds), PPA 1 (1.5 for Ds), SHP 2, Ft 2, HIT 0.6, BLK 0.6, SOG 0.3 (0.4 for Ds), FW 0.1, Tk 0.5 // Gv -0.3
Goalies: W 3.5, SHO 5, SV 0.5, A 3 // GA -3, L -1.5
4C, 4LW, 4RW, 6D, 2G, 4BN, 4IR
C: McDavid, MacKinnon, Hischier
LW: B.Tkachuk, Ovechkin, Paul(C), Jankowski(C)
LW/RW: Meier, Fiala, Giroux(C), Niederreiter
RW: Reinhart, Anderson, Armia
D: Josi, Matheson, Durzi, Zadorov, Moser, Cernak, Siegenthaler, Stanley
G: Daccord, Merzlikins, Pickard
50 minors; most noteables: A.Schmid, L.Bichsel, M.Kesselring, S.Malinski, B.Pachal, M.Pospisil, N.Huuhtannen, E.Soderblom,...
Points only: Laine vs Puljujarvi
Who do you like more? So much recent hype on Laine, but gut feeling says Puljujarvi is better offensively. From limited viewing Laine seems to have the better shot but Puljujarvi seems like he drives the play better. Hoping someone with more exposure can comment.
Nothing I have seen/heard would sway me from seeing Laine as the better points only player.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)