Value for Stamkos?

[oli88]

I'm in a keeper league with 26 teams.

I have Stamkos in my team, and some people are talkin trade with me and ask for Stamkos.

What is his value?

Someone offered me Tarasenko + Scherbak..but I think it's not enough. Should I ask for Tarasenko + Ehlers?

[0PucksGiven]

Unless it's Crosby or two top 10 guys you don't move stammer

[rufio.85]

I don't think Tarasenko + Ehlers is nearly enough for Stammer.
Stamkos' value is down this year but it's only a matter of time before it goes up again with all the talent surrounding him in TB.
He remains a top 5-7 option in any league imo.
It would take a Tarasenko + a similar young gun (Forsberg?) to simply draw my attention.
You need something more tangible than that to move a player like Stamkos.

[pmorrow]

I'm in a keeper league with 26 teams.

I have Stamkos in my team, and some people are talkin trade with me and ask for Stamkos.

What is his value?

Someone offered me Tarasenko + Scherbak..but I think it's not enough. Should I ask for Tarasenko + Ehlers?

Tarasenko is in a career year but he's still only at a point per game. Stamkos has already scored 60 goals and topped 90 points 3 times. This is not even remotely close to enough for Stamkos.

[Top_Shelf]

I dont think any of those offers are close...but in a 26 team league I'd imagine depth is pretty critical to success so I can understand why you'd be interested in a 2 for 1. With that said, you need to get more then then Tank + a prospect for Stammer.

[Dobber]

It would take a Tarasenko + a similar young gun (Forsberg?) to simply draw my attention.

This is a good suggestion. Right in the wheelhouse of his value IMO

Tarasenko is in a career year but he's still only at a point per game. Stamkos has already scored 60 goals and topped 90 points 3 times. This is not even remotely close to enough for Stamkos.

I think "remotely" is a strong word here. Tarasenko is in a career year and I think next year will be another career year. He's a stud with elite upside, probably more upside than Stamkos has. But he's not there yet, and is unproven. Whereas Stamkos is very much proven and what's more - Stamkos is highly highly regarded in fantasy hockey. You can get a king's ransom for him, so no need to settle for just Tarasenko and Ehlers.

[Leafs&G86]

I would want a lot more than what he been offered.

Just as a reference. League in my sig PPG, PPA, PPP, shots and hits. I accepted a stamkos offer back after the winter classic game.

I gave: stamkos, sceviour, santorelli and a 5th

I received: ovie, Simmonds wilson and a 2nd round pick

[pmorrow]

This is a good suggestion. Right in the wheelhouse of his value IMO


I think "remotely" is a strong word here. Tarasenko is in a career year and I think next year will be another career year. He's a stud with elite upside, probably more upside than Stamkos has. But he's not there yet, and is unproven. Whereas Stamkos is very much proven and what's more - Stamkos is highly highly regarded in fantasy hockey. You can get a king's ransom for him, so no need to settle for just Tarasenko and Ehlers.

Fair enough. If Tank can do it again next year then maybe this is a different conversation. But right now, like you say, he's definitely gotta get more.