trade emery

[Stevie19]

Stats for - G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, Hits, GWG+Shootout G, W, GAA, SV%, SO

I have Crawford, Holtby, Markstrom and Emery. Start 2 Goalies.

I trade Emery for Franzen, Ribeiro, or Dupius. Which of the three options is best?

[als_revenge]

Stats for - G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, Hits, GWG+Shootout G, W, GAA, SV%, SO

I have Crawford, Holtby, Markstrom and Emery. Start 2 Goalies.

I trade Emery for Franzen, Ribeiro, or Dupius. Which of the three options is best?

Without knowing your team (and hence what your team needs most), I'm not sure there is any meaningful way to answer that. But if that's all I have to go on, I'll take what is behind door number two in Phoenix.

[Stevie19]

Without knowing your team (and hence what your team needs most), I'm not sure there is any meaningful way to answer that. But if that's all I have to go on, I'll take what is behind door number two in Phoenix.

C- Brassard, Conacher, O'reilly, Shaw, Kuznetsov, Strome
LW- Huberdeau, Lucic, JVR
RW- Clarkson, Kessel, Yakupov, Simmonds

Start 3 at each postion. I have lots of C, but no star. I'm pretty set a RW. Could use another LW.

[als_revenge]

C- Brassard, Conacher, O'reilly, Shaw, Kuznetsov, Strome
LW- Huberdeau, Lucic, JVR
RW- Clarkson, Kessel, Yakupov, Simmonds

Start 3 at each postion. I have lots of C, but no star. I'm pretty set a RW. Could use another LW.

That makes it easy to eliminate Franzen from the list. Ribeiro gives you a better top-3 option at C, while Dupuis gives you more depth at LW. I think I go Ribeiro, just because after Brassard and O'Reilly, you have a lot of question marks at C.

[Stevie19]

That makes it easy to eliminate Franzen from the list. Ribeiro gives you a better top-3 option at C, while Dupuis gives you more depth at LW. I think I go Ribeiro, just because after Brassard and O'Reilly, you have a lot of question marks at C.

In our league Franzen and Dupuis are both LW/RW eligible. But I still like the idea of getting Ribeiro.

[mounD]

C- Brassard, Conacher, O'reilly, Shaw, Kuznetsov, Strome
LW- Huberdeau, Lucic, JVR
RW- Clarkson, Kessel, Yakupov, Simmonds

Start 3 at each postion. I have lots of C, but no star. I'm pretty set a RW. Could use another LW.

Your depth at Center is weakest, and Ribeiro is the best player of those three. Easy choice for me.

[Southpaw20]

Ribeiro for me as well...even though he is in the desert

[One87]

Ribeiro would be the clear choice to me.

[agoodburn]

Dupuis for me. He covers off a need for you at LW and he plays with Crosby which increases his point ceiling substantially.

[Stevie19]

Or I was offered Green, or Shattenkirk for Markstrom. I'm a little thin on D, but thought I could fill that through the draft or free agents.

[agoodburn]

Your team isn't in a win position anyways, so I would rather hang onto Markstrom and see what his value ends up at. Your D picture hopefully is clearer in a few years down the road when your forwards are maturing.
If you were going to do the deal I would prefer Shattenkirk just because Green at this point is questionable on whether he can return to pre-injury form. Shattenkirk is really underrated because everyone focuses on Pieterangelo in STL.
Selling high on Crawford might speed up your timeframe to compete. I would look at Lehner, a decent young D and maybe a pick for him.

[MXHockey]

That makes it easy to eliminate Franzen from the list. Ribeiro gives you a better top-3 option at C, while Dupuis gives you more depth at LW. I think I go Ribeiro, just because after Brassard and O'Reilly, you have a lot of question marks at C.

Great post, completely agree with this.

Cheers.