Crosbt FOR Ovechkin and Getzlaf

[IslanderFan]

In a keeper league (goals = 2 points, assists =1 point), should I trade Crosby for Ovechkin and Getzlaf (or Ovechkin and Parise)??

[Shoeless]

Do you have a problem dumping a guy because of the 2 for 1? If yes, who is it because that matters - if no then I would do this deal. I think Ovechkin is good for 10 more goals than Crosby which will close the gap between them in your league - I do think Ovechkin may chase Crosby for points for several years - either Getz or Parise are fine keepers - slight advantage Getzlaf. Unless you have to dump someone of value - I think this deal is good for your side.

[Lamplighter]

I am with Shoeless on this one. Yes, you are giving up the #1 fantasy player in the game, but his advantage over Ovechkin is really not all that great. Add Getzlaf, a youngster who has loads of upside, and I think this is a deal you should do.

As Shoeless also mentioned, if you are going to be dumping a real good player to make the deal, don\'t do it. Otherwise, I would pull the trigger on this one, and fast! :woohoo:

[sakic19]

Do the trade and dont think about it twice, especially that goals count for more, wow do it now!!

[IslanderFan]

same answer even if its Parise instead of Getzlaf?

[WildHendy]

YES....Parise and Getzky both will dominate soon.

[sakic19]

its not as big as a steal but id still do it.

[lanky522]

Yeah I think it\'s a good deal, it\'s close though... by no means a \"win\" for either party. But it\'s a good trade and great centers are easier to find than top left wings (or even just top wings for that matter).

I wouldn\'t take parise though. NJ is a scorers deathtrap and he\'s there for a while. Go with getzlaf.

[Fighting_Emu]

What about Crosby for OV and EJ?

[lanky522]

after looking at your team in the other post, I think that I\'d do crosby for a.o. and ej.

You need help on the wing fairly despirately, and your centers are fairly set, so you don\'t need getzlaf.

EJ is a stud starting as soon as the second half of this year (next year by the latest).