Definitely do it with either Visnovsky or Souray. I think you win either way.
I\'m thinking of offering this deal...I know Lundqvist > Smith and Koivu > Jokinen (so far at least) and his team needs some defense. To even this trade out, is offering Souray too much? Or would Visnovsky be a better option?
I also thought of dealing (and selling higher on) Clemmensen instead of Smith, because come February, when MB gets back, at least I\'ll have another starting goalie (who mind you will put up great SV% and decent GAA as always).
His other goalies are Turco and Conklin. His other centers are Malkin and Stastny (out now).
Happy Holidays!
Trevi
One Year H2H 12 Team
Stats: G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, W, GAA, SV%, SHO
C (2): Thornton, H. Sedin, Briere, Arnott
LW (2): Nash, Gagne, Whitney, Kariya,
RW (2): Doan, Hemsky, Dumont
D (4): Bieksa, Visnovsky, Suter, Doughty
G (2): Thomas, Miller, Anderson
Definitely do it with either Visnovsky or Souray. I think you win either way.
i disagree.....Koivu isn\'t better than Jokinen....not even close...but i do think you should do the deal if you can pull it off.
I am not sure that it is going to get you much further ahead but you should be better off with Lundy.
I would send Souray, he will probably get injured soon.
Thanks for the input. Would it be more appealing if I put Smith or Clemmensen?
One Year H2H 12 Team
Stats: G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, W, GAA, SV%, SHO
C (2): Thornton, H. Sedin, Briere, Arnott
LW (2): Nash, Gagne, Whitney, Kariya,
RW (2): Doan, Hemsky, Dumont
D (4): Bieksa, Visnovsky, Suter, Doughty
G (2): Thomas, Miller, Anderson
Definitely Clemmensen. Smith has been the only bright spot for Tampa and we all know who will be the starter in Jersey starting in March or so...