1 or 2?

[_]im]

1. boyes, sharp (c,lw), zubov

for

2. nash, toews, boyle


I feel like I\'m giving up 2 40g scorers for one but definately solidifying my D.

Which side would you want?

[littleranger]

2.

[hockeyislife]

I\'ll take side two everytime.

Boyes and Sharp are good players, but niether has the upside potential of Nash or Toews.

Zubov isn\'t the same player he used to be; age and injury are taking a toll on his production levels. Boyle should be a top producer at D for another 3 or 4 years.

Just my $.02

[Sleemans]

Easily side 2

[bleedblue]

you won on every player in the deal, boyle is younger then zubov, nash finally has help, a future line of nash-brassard-voracek would help him alot, so he could get alot more assists and become a complete player, and toews has the potential to be a 100 point guy, i see a joe sakic in him, a number 1 center with a combination of huge talent and great leadership

[MXHockey]

Side 2, and this is absolute robbery.

[_]im]

so i guess 2?

this is a one year roto too...dont know if that factors in