Kulich for Zellweger
20 team keeper (not the one in my sig).
I am in the middle of a rebuild and have a pretty good crop of young forwards, and I'm looking to move one for a comparable quality dman. Dmen are hard to get in this league, an 80-90 point forward is comparable in value to a 60-70 pt dman (scoring boost for dmen, plus difficulty in acquiring).
4C, 8W, 6D, 1G; G (x2 for D), A, Hits, +/-
Keep 14 players plus 10 farm (23 or younger)
(7 round draft plus 6 FA pickups/yr)
Current Keepers:
K. Connor
J. Kyrou
L. Raymond
S. Jarvis
W. Johnston
C. Perfetti
J. Berggren
P. Dorofeyev
A. Protas
L. Stankoven
J. Kulich
G. Perreault
Q. Musty
I. Howard
D. But
Z. Werenski
J. Valimaki
A. Nikishin
D. Mateychuk
J. Spence
S. Behrens
Ingram
UPL
I'm not too thrilled with the defensive depth, would Kulich for Zellweger make sense?
12 Team Dynasty, H2H (points)
Dress 2C, 4W, 1F, 4D, 1G (Daily)
G (3), A (2), STP (1), SHOG (1), +/- (0.5), SOG (0.2), Hits (0.2), Blk (0.2), FOW (0.1); W (5), SO (2), Sv (0.2), GA (-1)
C - Draisaitl (W), Hughes, Larkin, Trochek
W - T.Thompson (C), Pastrnak, Reinhart, Batherson, Nichushkin, Duchene (C), Zuccarello
D - Dahlin, Theodore, Bouchard, Faber, Werenski, Skjei
G - Jarry, Gustavsson, Montembault
Fm - Bordeleau, Barlow, Lucius, G.Perreault, Luneau, Perunovich, Nikishin
Re: Kulich for Zellweger
I think I make that deal. In general, when lookin at prospects, forwards > defensemen, but as you say, you've got good forward depth while your D keepers are on the weak side. Zellweger, despite being only a year older, also seems a lot closer to being an NHL mainstay. With Drysdale out of the picture, he should stick with the Ducks next year while Kulich could easily spend another season or two developing in the AHL.
12-Team Yahoo H2H Keeper League (Salary cap for keepers only)
3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 1 UTIL, 2G (6 BN, 6 IR+, 1 NA)
G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, HIT, BLK / W, GAA, SV%, SHO
C - S. Aho, M. Beniers, S. Crosby, B. Jenner, L. Stankoven
LW - C. Caufield, J. Hughes, T. Moore, J. Slafkovsky, O. Tippett
RW - D. Batherson, C. Keller, A. Lafreniere, S. Reinhart
D - E. Bouchard, B. Dillon, M. Roy, M. Seider, C. York
G - J. Binnington, J. Saros, J. Swayman
IR+: T. Demko, T. Hertl, K. Johnson, G. Landeskog, J. Trouba
NA: B. Othmann
Re: Kulich for Zellweger
Well, if your league value that much dman vs foward (I do) I think you will have to offer someone like Raymond to get Zellweger, but if you can just trade Kulich it will be a huge win for you IMO.
Good luck!
10 team dynasty (salary cap), start every week 12 fowards, 6 defenses and 2 goalies
Fowards: G, A
Defense: G, A, short handed time (0,25 pt / 2 min)
Goalies: W 2 pt, OT lost 1pt, Shootout lost 1pt, shutout 1pt
F: Gaudreau, Matthews, Malkin, Eichel, Fiala, Zibanejad, Pavelski, Rust, Nelson, Suzuki, Eriksson Ek, Sharangovich
D: Karlsson, Josi, Heiskanen, Montour, Theodore, Ekholm
G: Sorokin, Bobrovsky
Bench: Skinner, Mittelstadt, Couture, RyJo, Lehkonen, Coyle, Yamamoto, Barbashev, DeBrusk, Coronato, Luostarinen, Provorov, Lindell, Spurgeon, Orlov, Korchinski, Fleury, Samsonov, Blackwood, Husso, Vejmelka, Ersson
Farm: Snuggerud, Miroshnichenko, But, Brisson, Rosen
Re: Kulich for Zellweger
In a vacuum I would take Kulich but based on your league it sound like a good trade. Both players have a lot of competition.
10 Team, 60 Player Roster
G, A, PTS, PPP, PIM, BLKs, Hits, +/-, Shots, W, GAA, SV%, Saves
C- JHughes, Trocheck, RThomas, Zegras, Norris, Bennett, PLD, Stephenson, Danualt
RW- Raymond, Stone, TWilson, Toffoli, KJohnson, Nyqvist, Zary
LW- Keller, Schmaltz, Bunting, Skinner, Barbashev, Duclair
D- QHughes, McAvoy, Doughty, Heiskanen, LHughes, Mintyukov
G- Shesterkin, Demko, Andersen, Kahkonen, Levi, Tarasov, Annunen
Notable Prospects- Nikishin, Kulich, Leonard, Wood, Perreault, Lekkermaki, Ostlund, Othmman, REvans, L-Heureux, Ivanov, Murashov
Re: Kulich for Zellweger
Since Dmen have a higher value I would do the trade. But I’m a big fan of Kulich though.
Re: Kulich for Zellweger
Zellweger for me. I think that wiith respect to prospects, you lean preferring forwards up to a certain point where defensemen have proven themselves more, and I think Zellweger has reached that point.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote