I touched on it but it bears repeating:
Kuzmebko played 16:15 atoi last year. He started at fifteen and a half or so in q1 and worked up to 16 and a halfish by q4.
Vancouver had no business signing a player like Kuzmebko to the contract they did. They're a supposedly rebuilding team who needed consistency and projectability. They signed him anyways. Why? I believe its because THEY believe they have an unearthed a gem and a core player. There was a roft with Tochhet- as mentioned- but Tocchet has done a 180 on this player- at least publicly in what he shares in press conferences. Tocchet went to bat for a ayer like Phil Kessel and got the most out of him. I believe the coach AND the organization are behind Kuzmenko 100%. Hexk they had to drive 18 hours out of their way for their forst meeting with him and they did exactly that.
Why does this matter? Because a core player doesn't play 16 minutes a night. Petterson ayed over 20, Horvath averaged over 20 before the trade, even boeser averaged over 19 minutes in his prime- and this year at his worst he was on the ice a minute and a half longer! This is a player who could easily- very easily stand to gain 3 to 4 full minutes of atoi.
Could he have a sophomore slump? Sure but this isn't some fresh faced rookie. Hes 27 years old and hes been a professional athlete for half a decade already. There are some very real barriers to success coming over from the KHL- language, among style, ice size- and now the suggestion is that with a year to acclimate better, to specialize his training, to develop a short hand with the coaching staff- hes going to just implode? Huh?
There have been some cogent points made as to why Kuzmenko might regress- and I can appreciate that- I really can. Looking at things like shooting percentage and secondary assists has value for anyone trying to get a bettwr understanding of this player. Those things are not the FULL picture though. A 3 to 4 minute hike in ice time, a year to acclimate better, growing chemistry with a superstar- I believe these things can at the very least offset the potential recgression thats being argued here.
Im a fan of your characterization here P7. Its always been my belief that stats only tell a part of the story- an important part- but a part nonetheless. Kuzmenkos skillets shook fun to watch. Also I just wanted to say there IS a world where this is just a consumate pro who may not have been much of a sniper- but is just doing everything he is humanly capable of to help get pucks in the nets for the Canucks. I think that should be applauded personally- hell of a player...