US election thread?

[doulos]

hmmm - Hearing now that Wisconsin has more votes than registered voters.

Wonder what that could mean.

Wisconsin is going to be disputed, as it should. BIG time.

It means people registered on election day. This is all easily verified stuff that anyone who was paying attention (even me, as a Canadian) knew.

[blayze]

What a stunning turnaround this morning. Looks like there's hope!

I would love to see Trump follow through on his ridiculous Supreme Court threat just so he can be humiliated when they throw it out. The irony of his bitching is that if he had his wish, then all ballots that haven't been counted as of last night would be disqualified and guess who would be President by default... Biden

[Loch]

Fair enough, but it's still close enough to ask for a recount.
This is a no-brainer.

If there's one thing Trump knows, it is how to spot a no-brainer.

[Auston'sWilly]

It means people registered on election day. This is all easily verified stuff that anyone who was paying attention (even me, as a Canadian) knew.

My humble apologies.
Nonetheless, Wisconsin should be disputed.

[blayze]

Based on how close it is right now, Wisconsin will likely be subject to recount - which is fine, but don't expect it to change the result.

[doulos]

Based on how close it is right now, Wisconsin will likely be recounted - which is fine, but don't expect it to change the result.

Wisconsin does not have any automatic recount laws it seems, so unlikely since the gap is 20k. But who knows.

[2014olympicgold]

Some states have automatic recounts if within a certain percentage, and other states have a "if it's close, the loser can ask for a recount".

Also, "stop counting votes in Pennsylvania! I don't like how you counted votes over night in Wisconsin and Michigan! Also, please continue to count in Nevada and Arizona"

[Auston'sWilly]

It's a good question. Any statisticians out there ?

@DineshDSouza
·
6m
What is the statistical probability that out of 100,000+ votes counted after hours, all of them go to one candidate? #Election2020

[lucafen4]

I've seen something like this before.....




This is a fun troll, nothing more. #findthehumour

lol at this vertical line that suddenly jumps Biden into the lead, early morning.

Premature to claim fraud, I guess, but this has to be audited. How convenient for Biden to surge like this right at the end (in multiple states, btw, not just Wisconsin)


Attachment 4974

[doulos]

Regarding the 130k votes.

Basically zero. But it didn't happen so it doesn't matter.

https://twitter.com/BigStimpin3/stat...16233814102023

[lucafen4]

Regarding the 130k votes.

Basically zero. But it didn't happen so it doesn't matter.

https://twitter.com/BigStimpin3/stat...16233814102023

You mean they took 130 000 votes away from Biden?

[blayze]

The vast majority of mail-in ballots will be pro-Biden.

[2014olympicgold]

It's a good question. Any statisticians out there ?

@DineshDSouza
·
6m
What is the statistical probability that out of 100,000+ votes counted after hours, all of them go to one candidate? #Election2020

Depends how the data was collected.

There's 100% chance if they counted votes, separated them into Trump and Biden then had them recounted to make sure, then submitted numbers. So all submitted were Biden at that one time.

I'd be much more curious on the counts over 4hrs vs that snapshot.


Or how other people have shown the actual truth...a typo happened on one website.

[doulos]

Ok, well I'm going to get nothing done today unless I pull the internet plug. Have fun watching everyone. Lots could still happen it seems.

[2014olympicgold]

Regarding the 130k votes.

Basically zero. But it didn't happen so it doesn't matter.

https://twitter.com/BigStimpin3/stat...16233814102023

Matt Machowiak, the man Trump retweeted about this, ended up deleting the tweet because he found out it was a typo, Trump has yet correct his retweet. But what Matt Machowiak (not verified btw) found out, and retweeted was it was a typo, and even better he retweets a @baseballcrank (verified) a stat showing that Jo Jorgensen lost 311,000 votes in the same timespan. So whats more believable, a typo that gave Jorgensen 24% of the votes at the same time Biden didn't get his 100k votes, or a conspiracy theory?