Samsonov ++ for Shesterkin ++

[DudeImJason]

Got offered

Samsonov + Forsberg + Brannstrom (who can be stashed in minors up until his 150GP)
or
Shesterkin (can be stashed up until 150GP) + Ristolainen + Rakell

team is in SIG

G(3)a(2)+/-(0.2)Pims(0.3)SHG/PPG(1)SHA/PPA(0.5)gwg(0.5)FOW/FOL(0.1/-0.1)SoG(0.3)HIT(0.3)BS(0.3)

W(3)L(-2)OTL(-1.5)Sv(0.2)GA(-0.5)SO(3)

[Eskimo Brother]

In your league I imagine goalies are really valuable. I think you could sell Shesty for more than Samsonov and a LW upgrade that you don't need.

[tobias]

In good conscious, I can't often argue that "goalies are voodoo", and then confidently recommend Shesterkin over Samsonov, even though I much prefer the Rangers over the Capitals going forward. So, I will therefore call the goalies a wash, as both SHOULD be the starter next year (more comfortable in Samsonov being a starter than Shesterkin, until we see what happens with Lundqvist and Georgiev).

In this format, I prefer Ristolainen over Brannstrom more than I do Forsberg over Rakell. For that reason, give me the Ristolainen side.

[jhonny]

In good conscious, I can't often argue that "goalies are voodoo", and then confidently recommend Shesterkin over Samsonov, even though I much prefer the Rangers over the Capitals going forward. So, I will therefore call the goalies a wash, as both SHOULD be the starter next year (more comfortable in Samsonov being a starter than Shesterkin, until we see what happens with Lundqvist and Georgiev).

In this format, I prefer Ristolainen over Brannstrom more than I do Forsberg over Rakell. For that reason, give me the Ristolainen side.

I gotta second this entire post!