Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Second opinion

  1. #16
    Rep Power
    0

    The Great One

    Default Re: Second opinion

    Id really try to work ep right out of this equation. Nylander projects pretty mediocre in the short yerms but burns is a MONSTER. Id try to switch the dialogue to mac plus for burns. Maybe add in j vo? If youre talking ep and mac for burns and laine thats a way different equation. I think he would balk at that. I think id do it even with voracek involved...

  2. #17
    FFleming5's Avatar
    FFleming5 is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    899
    Location
    Chicago
    Rep Power
    19

    Dobber Sports Initiate

    Default Re: Second opinion

    I agree with Emu - remove EP40 from the offering - Burns for McAvoy and Voracek would be a great move for a win this year.

    Also agree that other owner would likely balk at Laine - as EP40 doesn’t have the name value yet but has the skillset (hence why you’re willing to sell low on him).

    I don’t think you can get true value for EP40 right now and given his upside and future ceiling, I think you should just hold the asset. EP40 is the kind of player to build your team around in the future

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •