Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Second opinion

  1. #16
    Fighting_Emu's Avatar
    Fighting_Emu is offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Rep Power

    Dobber Sports Icon

    Default Re: Second opinion

    Id really try to work ep right out of this equation. Nylander projects pretty mediocre in the short yerms but burns is a MONSTER. Id try to switch the dialogue to mac plus for burns. Maybe add in j vo? If youre talking ep and mac for burns and laine thats a way different equation. I think he would balk at that. I think id do it even with voracek involved...
    14 team cap league (30 mil above nhl)
    Daily Changes- 3c 3rw 3lw 3 forward flex 5d 2g 8bn ir+
    Weekly hth - g a p ppp shp pim sog +/- gwg - w sv% so gaa saves
    27 man farm team - no cap - junior team can hold prospects to up till 3 years
    C Ziba Kadri Gallagher
    Rw Tarasenko Pacioretty Perron
    Lw Forberg Hall Skinner
    Flex E Kane Pacioretty Kovalchuk
    D Karlsson Ghost Hamilton Krug Heed
    G Andersen Flurry
    BN Djoos Terry maroon Hinnestroza Jarnkrok Lehkonen Hartman Quick Mrazek
    Notable prospects and farm- Vanek B3mmstrom Zavgordiniviy
    Cap 109 out of 109

  2. #17
    FFleming5's Avatar
    FFleming5 is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Rep Power

    Dobber Sports Apprentice

    Default Re: Second opinion

    I agree with Emu - remove EP40 from the offering - Burns for McAvoy and Voracek would be a great move for a win this year.

    Also agree that other owner would likely balk at Laine - as EP40 doesnít have the name value yet but has the skillset (hence why youíre willing to sell low on him).

    I donít think you can get true value for EP40 right now and given his upside and future ceiling, I think you should just hold the asset. EP40 is the kind of player to build your team around in the future

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts