Reply With Quote40+ points? Definitely.
paul martin
Is he a decent breakout candidate? I know he was highly touted a few years ago and is the #1 guy now but I haven\'t seen him play much. Rafalski-like numbers possible? What say you?
Re:paul martin
40+ points? Definitely.
Re:paul martin
He\'s going to eat up all of Ralfaski\'s mintues from last year and get tons of PP time. He\'ll be the top point getter on NJ\'s defense.
Team 1
C: Kuznetsov
LW: Ovechkin, Hall, Gaudreau, Huberdeau
RW: Perry, Voracek, Nyquist
D: Hedman,
G: Schneider, Hellebuyck*
Prospects: Lazar, Mantha, Bjorkstrand, Gillies, P.L. Dubois, Konency
* Prospect Bonus
Team 2
C: Crosby, Malkin, Backstrom, Coyle
LW: Saad, Lucic, van Reimsdyk, Kuznetsov
RW: Ovechkin, Connolly
D: Byfuglein, Krug, Green, Lindholm, Savard
G: Price, Varlamov, Anderson, Bernier, Pickard
Prospects: Nurse, Milano, Hellebuyck, Jarry, Gillies, Chychrun
Re:paul martin
If you want Rafalski-esque numbers, try Andy Greene instead. The undrafted former college defenseman was one of Jersey\'s best when injuries hit- and he was a rookie.
Re:paul martin
Should be 40pts but won\'t get you Rafalski type #\'s. He had every opportunity to do so last year. Consider him a career 40pt guy at best.
Posting Permissions