Reply With QuotePersonally I prefer Gibson over Bishop for long term. Both are on a good team but Gibson is younger and have more pedigree than Bishop. Also, TB got some good goaltending behind Bishop so there's always that small threat...
Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
Had a GM ask about Gibson and Bishop came up as a possible trade for him. Not sure if it'd be straight up, but close. Long term who do you want? First league in Sig.
Keep 5 12 Team H2H
Daily:2C,2LW,2RW,2F,4D,2G
Skate:G,A,TP+/-,PPP,SHP,GWG,SOG
G:W,GAA,SV,SV%,SO
Keepers Bolded
C: Kadri, Trochek, E.Linholdm(RW), W.Karlsson
LW: Ovechkin, Arvidsson(RW), Marchsessault(C), Keller(C,RW)
RW: Seguin, Zuccarello, K.Hayes(C),
D: Karlsson, Hamilton, Krug, Green, Phaneuf
G: Holtby, Talbot, Lehner
IR: Burakovsky
NA:
Keep 6 12 Team H2H
Daily:2C,2LW,2RW,2F,4D,2G
Skate:G,A,PPP,SHP,GWG,SOG,HIT,BLK
G:W,GAA,SV,SV%,SO
C: Scheifele, Kuznetsov,Pavelski(RW)
LW: Forsberg,W.Karlsson(C),Connor,JT Miller(C,LW)
RW: P.Kane, Tarasenko,Stone,Bailey
D: Byfgulien,Subban,Chabot,Ellis,Gudas
G: Holtby,Varlamov,Markstrom
IR: Darling,Fabbri
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
Personally I prefer Gibson over Bishop for long term. Both are on a good team but Gibson is younger and have more pedigree than Bishop. Also, TB got some good goaltending behind Bishop so there's always that small threat...
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
I think it's a toss up really. Both should be great goaltenders in the future.
Yahoo Fantasy Roto league. 14 teams
Categories: Goals, Assists, Hits, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, Wins, GAA, SV%, Shutouts
Position Slots:
(2 C's)(2 LW's)(2 RW's)(F)(3 D's)(G)
Forwards:
Aho (c)
Mackinnon (c)
Verhaeghe (c/lw)
Ovechkin (lw)
Zuccarello (rw)
Teravainen (lw/rw)
Sharangovich (lw/c/rw)
McCann (c/lw)
Defence:
Matheson
Theodore
Toews
Schenn
Goalies:
Ullmark, Lyon, Kochetkov, Swayman
IR: Ekblad
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
Until we find out more about the Anaheim goalie situation long term, I will take the proven star.
Bishop for me.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
Bishop for me too both goalie are band-aid boy but I prefer the one who is #1 NOW BISHOP...
10teams H2H keep 12 dress 3C,3LW,3RW,6D,2G,2uti+4bench
G,A,PIM,PPP,SOG,HIT,BS,W,L,GAA,SV%
C:GETZ,Pavelski,Rakell,Brassard
RW:P.Kane,Tarasenko,Wheeler,Silfverberg,Brown
LW:Paciorety,Mantha,Panik,Namestnikov
D:OEL,Burns,Josi,BUFF,E.Johnson,Sergachev,Mcavoy
G:Holtby,Dubnyk,Budaj
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
This is Bishop for me by a large gap. He's the #1 on a team that will only be shifting to more defensively responsibility with Stamko's exit and Hedman's takeover of the star of their team.
Gibson hasn't been able to shake Andersen as the #1 in Anaheim. Both Anaheim tenders are bandaid boys, and neither could be depended on solo by any sort of sane GM. Andersen is the 1A this past month, with 8 wins 1.96GAA and .929 sv%
That gap a potential to close, or even grow, this off season. That is, Anaheim could make a decision to ship Andersen out as hes an RFA (or Gibson), or maybe TB makes a move to capitalize on Bishop's value as hes an UFA after next year.
Weekly H2H
G / A / P / +- / PowerPlayPoints / Shots / Goalie Wins / GAA / Save%
Re: Long Term: Gibson or Bishop
Is the band-aid boy label fair for Bishop? He played 63 games in 2013-14, 62 games in 2014-15, and is on pace to play 63 games in 2015-16.Originally Posted by bluteau
Posting Permissions