Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Trade Veto?

  1. #16
    P-Giddy's Avatar
    P-Giddy is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    693
    Rep Power
    13

    Dobber Sports Apprentice

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    I think the Malkin side wins, but no way it should be vetoed.
    10 Team, Weekly H2H (Set Daily), 31-Player, No Cap, Dynasty League

    Categories: G, A, +/-, Hits, PPP, ATOI, SOG, W, S%, GAA

    F: Crosby,
    Seguin, Kessel, Malkin, Tarasenko, Laine, Hall, Pacioretty, Panarin, Gaudreau, Kuznetsov, Kucherov, Eichel, Monahan, Krejci, Huberdeau, Scheifele, Drouin, S. Reinhart, Radulov

    D: Karlsson, Hedman, Shattenkirk,
    Barrie, Hamilton, Gostisbehere, Vatanen

    G: Rask, Fleury, Dubnyk, Schneider

  2. #17
    Rep Power
    18

    Dobber Sports Ace

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    Its definitely a bad trade, I can see why it was vetoed
    14 team H2H fantasy points league
    G=3 A=2 PPP=1.5 PIM/Hits/BS=0.25
    W=4 SO=6 GA=-1.25 SV=0.15

  3. #18
    jmouland's Avatar
    jmouland is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    393
    Location
    Calgary
    Rep Power
    15

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    Quote Originally Posted by MJFP View Post
    Dont even need to see the trade.

    Was it collusion?

    Yes? Veto

    No? Do not Veto.
    This.
    20 team H2H Fantrax Cap Dynasty
    2018/2018 Cap=90 mil
    G, A, +/-, PPP, SHP, PIM, SOG, FO%, HIT, BLK, TOI/G
    W, GAA, SV%, SV, SHO
    3C/LW/RW, 6D, 2Sk, 2G

    C: Backstrom, Bergeron, Eichel
    L: Benn, Rakell, Coleman, Goldobin, Weal, B. McGinn
    R: Pavelski, Radulov, Panik, B. Tanev, D. Ryan
    D: Burns, Josi, Weber, Ellis, Manson, Forbort, Stecher, Weegar
    G: Talbot, Elliott
    Farm: Harkins, Hayden, Kampf, Highmore, Dickinson, Bjork, Motte, Foegele, Rychel, Kossila, Poturalski, Graves, Bear, Nielsen, Timmins, Ozhiganov, McKeown, Gillies, Boyle, Brossoit, Ellis, Rittich

  4. #19
    junyab's Avatar
    junyab is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,031
    Rep Power
    21

    Dobber Sports Padawan

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    Having trades needing approval by consensus vote is a BIG problem...some managers will simply veto every trade that they think:
    - has the slightest misvaluation
    - theyd have offered more
    - makes a team better than theirs

    This trade is NO WHERE near vetoable.
    Yahoo League #1 - H2H Keep 21
    [F] Tkachuk, Barkov, A Svechnikov, Kaprizov, DeBrincat, Scheifele, RNH, Suzuki, Laine, Kakko, Cozens
    [D] Makar, Hughes, Nurse, Chabot, Byram
    [G] Hart, Shesterkin, Lehner, Helle

    Yahoo League #2 - H2H Keep 22
    [F] MacKinnon, Guentzel, DeBrincat, EP40, Gaudreau, Barzal, Hughes, Laine, Garland, Norris, Batherson, Farabee
    [D] Hedman, MacAvoy, Nurse, Chabot, Pionk, Byram
    [G] Nedeljkovic, Smith, Gustavsson, Murray

  5. #20
    Dennis4022's Avatar
    Dennis4022 is offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,444
    Location
    Germany
    Rep Power
    36

    Dobber Sports Expert

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    I'd leave the league if a good hockey trade gets vetoed for no reason.

  6. #21
    Hoopo's Avatar
    Hoopo is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,139
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Rep Power
    28

    Dobber Sports Padawan

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    I'm OK with trades getting vetoed for reasons other than collusion. I've been in a number of pools where we have peopl that might not be all that up on hockey and can get completely fleeced in a trade. Really unbalanced trades are as bad for a pool as "collusion", which incidentally can never be proven without someone admitting to it.

    That said, this trade is not something I'd consider all that unbalanced. The Malkin side probably wins but it's not as though there's no risks with Malkin, and frankly the Zetterberg side might even put up more points this year. It's a bold trade and not something that should have been vetoed.
    10-team H2H points keeper league, keep 4
    G: 2, A: 2, SOG: 0.15, Hit: 0.15, Block: 0.15, W: 3.5, Sv: 0.025, SO: 6
    7 F, 3 D, 1 G

    2022-2023 Roster:
    F: Connor McDavid, Steven Stamkos, Artemi Panarin, Jack Hughes, Mark Stone, Josh Norris, Tyler Bertuzzi, PL Dubois, Sam Bennett, Tom Wilson (IR)
    D: Kris Letang, Drew Doughty, Brent Burns, Shayne Gostisbehere
    G: Ilya Sorokin, Thatcher Demko

  7. #22
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Supreme Grand Master

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    And that right there is why trading in fantasy is near impossible! Fair trades get vetoed when they shouldn't be.

  8. #23
    Dingy's Avatar
    Dingy is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    330
    Location
    Charlottetown PE
    Rep Power
    13

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    I agree that generally for me the only trade I will veto is one that has some hint of collusion. Otherwise, owners generally will only accept a trade they think they are getting some benefit from so my veto may interfere with their strategy.
    12 Team Roto Keeper
    G A +/- SOG PPP FOW HITS BLKS PIM
    W GA GAA SV SA SV% SHO
    10 Keepers
    F- Kopitar Kesler Thornton Benn Draisital Pacioretty Kuznetsov Backes D.Sedin Ryan Burakovsky
    D- Subban Faulk Byfuglien DeHann Martinez Trouba
    G- Halak Dubnyk Talbot
    BN- Bjugstad Dubinsky Ryan Gudas Tanev Hanzal Marleau

    12 Team H2H
    B- H/AB R H HR RBI SB K TB AVG OBP
    P - IP W HLD SV K ERA WHIP K/9

    B: Hosmer Donaldson Correa Trout Harper Heyward Sano Weiters Duffy Pillar Incarte Hernandez Realmuto Peraza Alvarez Span
    P: Cole Sale Fernandez Cueto Hamels Robertson Giles Wilson Colome Watson Samardzija Bauer Knebel
    F: Turner Travis Margot Stephenson Gouirrel Jr

  9. #24
    Rep Power
    35

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    Agreed. I can't stand vetoing

  10. #25
    Bobz's Avatar
    Bobz is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Rookie

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    Quote Originally Posted by rangerfan2430 View Post
    Agreed. I can't stand vetoing
    while tons of people may not like vetos they sometimes come in handy.. the Crosby owner in my league tried to trade Crosby for Steen.. he is still mad we vetoed it and doesnt understand why we did it lol


    but ya that trade looks decent from an outside standpoint
    ESPN 12 team H2H (points)
    Start: 9-F, 5-D, 1-Ult, 1-G... 5 Bench,
    Skater: G(3). A(2), PPP(1), SHP(2), HAT(2), PIM(0.2), SOG(0.2), BLK(0.3), HIT(0.3)
    Goalie: W(5), SV(0.2), GA(-1), SO(3)


    F: Kucherov, Panarin, Marner, Pacioretty, Kreider, Foligno, Keller, Lee, Palat, Lindholm, Tkachuk, Panik, Schmaltz, K. Connor
    D: Burns, Shattenkirk, Doughty, Zaitsev, Hanifin, Montour
    G: Gibson, Darlin

    IR: Eaves

  11. #26
    The Guvnah's Avatar
    The Guvnah is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Location
    Ontario
    Rep Power
    26

    Dobber Sports Padawan

    Default Re: Trade Veto?

    No way in hell should that trade be vetoed.

    Two years ago in my keeper league, an injured Pacioretty got traded for Cory Conacher. I just laughed, shook my head and said 'good for the new Patches owner'. I will fleece an opponent every chance I get, so I'm certainly not going to stop someone else from fleecing someone. This is far from a fleecing. It looks like a star-for-depth type of trade, so let it go.

    10th year Keeper League, Fantrax

    14 teams, H2H, keep 10, daily starts
    G (3), A (2), +/- (1), PIM (0.1), PPP (1), FOW (0.1), FOL (-0.1), BLK (0.5), HAT (3), W (5), SO (3), SV (0.1), GA (-0.5)

    C (3) - Schmaltz (LW, RW), Mercer (RW), Norris (IR), Domi (LW), T. Johnson (RW), Nosek (LW)
    LW (3) - Keller (RW), Hagel, McCann (C), Zacha (LW), Kubalik (RW), N. Foligno (IR)
    RW (3) - Fiala (LW), Vilardi (C), Ehlers (LW), Kakko
    D (4) - Theodore, Orlov, Grzelcyk, T. van Riemsdyk, Clifton, Skjei, Weegar
    Util (1)
    G (1) - Montembault, Allen, Halak



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •