Pastrnak, Palat, Pearson - Upside

[SergeP]

Rank the following in terms of upside (next 2-3 seasons)

Palat
Pastrnak
Person


Context: I've got an offer of my Pastrnak and Pearson for Palat. I'm hesitant to pull the trigger because I feel like Pastrnak and Palat are basically even in terms of upside, maybe slight edge to Palat. I've asked for a 2016 first rounder in addition to Palat which I feel would make the deal worthwhile for me.

Thoughts???

FYI - Scoring is G(3), A(2), +/-(1), SOG(0.1), Hit(0.1), Blk(0.1), PPP(1)

Full Dynasty, total points (not H2H)


Gracias

[Nikerato]

Pasta's stock has really grown in a short period of time eh?

Palat is still the best player here. He's a great two-way player that will always be around 60-65. Maybe flirting with 70 during his best years.

Pastrnak has a lot of potential but I just don't see the upside in Boston. They roll their lines and PP units so evenly, making it harder to produce elite numbers there. In the next 2-3 years, I see Pasta trying to get to where Palat already is but probably falling short (55-60 or so). Beyond that, he has the upside to approach 70 as well, especially with a different coach and better talent surrounding him.

Pearson doesn't have very much upside to me, due to his team and his talent. 50 points within the next 2-3 years and I don't think he will get much more than that.

[SergeP]

What about pasta and pullkinen for palat and a first?

[rainydrinkwater]

Pasta's stock has really grown in a short period of time eh?

Palat is still the best player here. He's a great two-way player that will always be around 60-65. Maybe flirting with 70 during his best years.

Pastrnak has a lot of potential but I just don't see the upside in Boston. They roll their lines and PP units so evenly, making it harder to produce elite numbers there. In the next 2-3 years, I see Pasta trying to get to where Palat already is but probably falling short (55-60 or so). Beyond that, he has the upside to approach 70 as well, especially with a different coach and better talent surrounding him.

Pearson doesn't have very much upside to me, due to his team and his talent. 50 points within the next 2-3 years and I don't think he will get much more than that.

My thoughts pretty much as well, particularly in the 2-3 year window specified.

[Wrist_Shot]

Pasta's stock has really grown in a short period of time eh?

Palat is still the best player here. He's a great two-way player that will always be around 60-65. Maybe flirting with 70 during his best years.

Pastrnak has a lot of potential but I just don't see the upside in Boston. They roll their lines and PP units so evenly, making it harder to produce elite numbers there. In the next 2-3 years, I see Pasta trying to get to where Palat already is but probably falling short (55-60 or so). Beyond that, he has the upside to approach 70 as well, especially with a different coach and better talent surrounding him.

Pearson doesn't have very much upside to me, due to his team and his talent. 50 points within the next 2-3 years and I don't think he will get much more than that.

Yep.

Palat for me, if you can get a pick too go for it.