Mark Stone
Now that we've seen a little bit more of Mark Stone, what kind of upside are we looking at with him, and what are his chances to hit it.
Re: Mark Stone
I maintain that he 'can' be a first liner producing in the 70s, but what has opened my eyes is his durability (or lack thereof). So will he be another Milan Michalek-type, who posts 45 points a year battling injuries...and then once every six or seven years gets 65 points? Precisely why I'm not actively seeking to acquire him
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
Re: Mark Stone
Pretty good insight here:
http://prospects.dobbersports.com/in...198-mark-stone
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
Re: Mark Stone
Yeah, sort of confirmed what I thought as well, but figured I'd try and ask. He seems to have a few red flags, between skating (which he has improved on) and injuries.
Thanks for the feedback!
Re: Mark Stone
Stone has been extremely impressive. He is just very smart and knows how to play the game offensively. Fits it,with Turris and MacArthur like a glove. Injuries are the biggest question mark, no question
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote