Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Cam Neely comparables

  1. #1
    Location
    Vancouver
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Juggernaut

    Default Cam Neely comparables

    Obviously there aren't any players who can concurrently intimidate with offense and physicality like Cam could in his prime... but who are the five closest comparisons?

    Am I off?

    Ovechkin
    Perry
    Backes
    Lucic
    Brown

    HM:

    Neal
    Nash
    E. Kane
    Follow me on Twitter: AngusCertified
    Check my blog out: Angus Certified

  2. #2
    Location
    Colorado
    Rep Power
    25

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by angus View Post
    Obviously there aren't any players who can concurrently intimidate with offense and physicality like Cam could in his prime... but who are the five closest comparisons?

    Am I off?

    Ovechkin
    Perry
    Backes
    Lucic
    Brown

    HM:

    Neal
    Nash
    E. Kane
    Good list!

    Landeskog might be another comparable. Get him into the playoffs and I think he'll shine!
    Yahoo 1 Year Leagues:
    G, A, PIM, +/-, PPP, SOG, HIT
    W, GAA, SV%, SHO
    2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G, 4Bn, 1IR

  3. #3
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Grand Master

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Veritas0Aequitas View Post
    Good list!

    Landeskog might be another comparable. Get him into the playoffs and I think he'll shine!
    Wow biased to the max. No. Just no. Landeskog can barely be considered a power forward, let alone a physically dominant force. In terms of offense and physicality, add Chris Stewart to the mix, expecially the way he's picked up his scoring this year. Probably not ahead of any of those 5, but still.

  4. #4
    Dakkster's Avatar
    Dakkster is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    11,669
    Location
    Halmstad, Sweden
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Juggernaut

    Default

    The only guys that are relevant in terms of physicality AND scoring ability are Ovy and Kane IMO. But they are still nowhere close.
    GO WINGS!

  5. #5
    Khanadian's Avatar
    Khanadian is offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    457
    Location
    Peg City
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dakkster View Post
    The only guys that are relevant in terms of physicality AND scoring ability are Ovy and Kane IMO. But they are still nowhere close.
    I was thinking this too...

    If the Jets ran Buff out there full-time at forward he'd qualify too!

  6. #6
    Location
    Colorado
    Rep Power
    25

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rataylor22 View Post
    Wow biased to the max. No. Just no. Landeskog can barely be considered a power forward, let alone a physically dominant force. In terms of offense and physicality, add Chris Stewart to the mix, expecially the way he's picked up his scoring this year. Probably not ahead of any of those 5, but still.
    LOL this is too much. You'd rank Chris Stewart in front of Landeskog? Did you see how many hits Landeskog had in his rookie year? 219. That was good enough for 19th among ALL NHL FORWARDS including guys like David Backes and Dustin Brown.

    How many hits did Chris Stewart have last year? 112. I'm not denying Chris Stewart is a powerforward, but there is no way he belongs in the same discussion as Landeskog.

    So, no. Not biased. You obviously have no clue what you're talking about.
    Yahoo 1 Year Leagues:
    G, A, PIM, +/-, PPP, SOG, HIT
    W, GAA, SV%, SHO
    2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G, 4Bn, 1IR

  7. #7
    Location
    Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Administrator

    Default

    And I came in here thinking the comparison would be players starting their careers in Vancouver and flourishing elsewhere... silly me.


    Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
    Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
    Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust

  8. #8
    Rep Power
    23

    Dobber Sports Stud

    Default

    I think Ovechkin is better than Neely in just about every aspect of the game - though to be fair, I've only seen Neely play a few times. Still, almost no one has or had the kind of game Ovechkin has- and I'm saying that as a Penguins fan.
    I am a die-hard Avalanche fan!
    PARTIAL DYNASTY (Keep 20 from year to year)
    2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G every night

    G ,A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, Hits, Blocks
    Wins, Saves, SV%, GAA, SO

    C-Eichel, Marner (RW), Matthews
    L- Skinner, Pacioretty, Vanek, Perlini, Palat
    R- Hoffman, Byron, Tuch, Kerfoot, Sprong
    D- Ekblad, Gostisbehere, Rielly, Borowiecki, Montour, Girard, Orpik, Schenn
    G-Fleury, Rask, Brossoit, Saros, Kuemper, Appleby

  9. #9
    Location
    Toronto
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Star

    Default

    The only guys that are relevant in terms of physicality AND scoring ability are Ovy and Kane IMO. But they are still nowhere close.
    I agree with this. A couple of years ago I probably would have included Iginla in this too, but he was never as physically punishing.

    Lucic has it from the physicality perspective, but he doesn't have the offensive skills.

    Perry is an agitator with great skills/hands... he won't make you regret being on the ice against him.

    Brown and Backes both have tough elements to their game, but their offensive skills aren't what Neely's were.

    For me the comparison comes down to a player having the tools to make a perfectly legitimate choice between making an opposing defender look like a pylon or physically taking them out of the play. I can't think of anyone but Evander Kane and Ovechkin that would fit the bill.

  10. #10
    Location
    Vancouver
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Juggernaut

    Default

    Thanks for the thoughts and opinions (except you, Eric).
    Follow me on Twitter: AngusCertified
    Check my blog out: Angus Certified

  11. #11
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Ninja

    Default

    Iginla has lost a step but in his prime he fit the description very well.

  12. #12
    27Blue's Avatar
    27Blue is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,785
    Rep Power
    0

    Banned

    Default

    iginla's best was better than neely's best - though iggy is the only name mentioned that is even remotely in the same class and style of player that neely was. people were afraid to play against cam neely... and they should have been.

  13. #13
    Location
    Philly
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Legend

    Default

    Neely was a rare bird. He was one of my favorite players as a kid so I watched him all the time. There is nobody today that is a Neely clone, but I will describe it this way...

    Lucic is the closest to Neely in terms is skating, hitting, compete level and raw nastiness. The biggest difference are the hands - Neely had mitts of gold.

    Ovechkin has more speed, sizzle and talent than Neely but isn't NEARLY as mean or physical - not even close. Same with Evander Kane, who is rugged by today's standards but nothing compared to Neely.

    Perry and Neal fit into the power forward/agitator category and are not as rugged or tough as Neely.

    Nash is not even close to the complete package Neely was.

    Iginla was close at one time but he is more finesse than Neely and smaller, less mean.

    Backes and Simmonds are hard-nosed, gritty types but neither have Neely's hands or game - same with Callahan, Brown or Clowe.

    The only comparable could be made with a hybrid approach - Thomas Vanek and Milan Lucic bundled together gives you Cam Neely. In close, Neely was blessed with incredible hands like Vanek. During the 80s-90s, the only players who were as dangerous as Neely from 15 feet in were Tim Kerr, Luc Robitaille and Dave Andreychuk.

    Neely played a lot like Vanek where he would battle in front of the net and score a bunch on the PP and in close. He could beat goalies with wristers, snappers, backhands and deflections - you name it. But he also was Milan Lucic at his best where he would hunt players and destroy them with heavy hits and battle anyone along the boards. He would also drop the gloves and punch tons of face.

    Yep - Vanek and Lucic hybrid = Cam Neely.
    8-GM / WK-H2H
    Forwards: G=2, A=1, PP/SH= +1, GWG= +2, Shootout G=1, HT= +1
    D-Men/Captain: G=3/A=2
    Goalies: W=3, OTL=1, SO= +2, SV= .10


    Start = 13F, 6D, 2G / Keep 44 (3G)
    Captain: Matthews
    (F): MacKinnon, Pasta, Marner, Rantanen, Malkin, Barkov, M.Tkachuk, W.Nylander, Pettersson, Gaudreau, Laine, Keller, Miller, B.Tkachuk, Stutzle, DeBrincat, L.Raymond, K.Johnson, Cozens, Quinn, Guenther, Kulich, Cooley
    (D): Makar, Dahlin, Q.Hughes, Ekblad, Rielly, Werenski, Letang, Jones, Chychrun,
    Seider, Edvinsson, Jiricek, Korchinski, Mintyukov, Ceulemans, Hutson
    (G): Shesterkin, Demko, Vejmelka

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •