Should I take any of these trades?

[mikey0620]

Hi first of thanks for anyone taking the time to look at this.

I'm in a points only league: g=2, a=1, +/-=.5, ppg=1, ppa=.5, etc...

Im in first place by a small margin.

My team:
center= tavares, staal
left wing= tlusty, benn, flippula
right wing=wheeler, jagr
def=campbell, wideman, yandle, goligolski
goalies=anderson, price, hedberg

bench=silverberg, pouliot, stewart

Trade offers=

Tavares, silverberg, filppula, hedberg
for
nash, phaneuf, green, miller


Benn, widemann, filppula
for
pavalski, semin, kronwall


Tavares +
for
Kovalchuk, franzen or ennis

Let me know what you think

thanks

[Pengwin7]

No on #2 & #3.

The only one that peaks my interest in #1.
First, get rid of Green. He's a bum, injured, don't expect anything from him rest of year.

But Nash/Phaneuf/Miller is still a nice return for Tavares/Silfv/Filpp/Hedberg.

I mean, I see Tavares as a 45/45 kind of player.
I see Nash as a 40/40 kind of player.

If you give up 5G, 5A to get Phaneuf & Miller... that's pretty good.
Especially when you've got a crap Hedberg and an injured Anderson.

If you need the goaltending (Miller), this isn't a bad trade to take.
This is the perfect (and possibly last) chance to buy low on Rick Nash, IMO.


If you like that first trade (and it depends on how many goalies you start: daily or weekly? If daily, having two with Miller is good stuff...), you may simply ask him to upgrade Green.
Tavares is a GEM... but the downgrade to Nash isn't enormous and you've got some good pieces here for your keeper squad.

[blayze]

I wouldn't take any of those offers.

#1 is the closest, but Green and Miller's values have both significantly diminished in my eyes... and it's been well documented on these forums how I feel about Nash