boyes + wolski for williams + redden

[superluke]

what duo you would like to own in a 1 pt keeper league with no position requirement

BOYES + Wolski

or

Willaims and redden

[87Flyer]

boyes and wolski

[joesakic88]

I don\'t know what DUO you receive. Both are good in a sens I like Williams and he proved is value so but wolski and boyes should be good too.


Mixed feeeling in my case

[hammer2003]

Does \"1 pt\" mean no PIMS or +/-? If PIMs and/or +/- count in your league I\'d take williams + redden. Points only I\'d take Wolski and Boyes if you are pretty sure Smyth\'s arrival in CO doesn\'t push Wolski off one of the top two lines in CO.

[Loki]

without position requirements most average forwards will even outscore a dman...take BOYES + Wolski

[hockeylifer]

Boyes: 46 points in 81 games - in Boston and St. Louis
Wolski: 50 points in 76 games
Williams: 67 points in 82 games
Redden: 36 points in 64 games

If this is as a trade offer then I would ask for a forward rather than a defenceman (Redden). If it isn\'t a trade then I don\'t understand why you would draft a defenceman rather than a forward. I guess I am suggesting that in comparing these two duos: Wolski/Boyes and Williams/Redden, we are comparing apples and oranges (considering 1 points for goals and assists with no positional requirements).

In comparing the duos I consider that the \'balance\' favors Wolski/Boyes.

Boyes seems to have found a home in St. Louis. He really started to produce once he arrived from Boston. His role will be higher. I think that his point production will improve this year.

Wolski will improve on his point production of last year.

Williams might have some slight improvement.

Redden: well, see my comments above. I would not expect much more from him.

Unless, I am missing something this clearly favors Wolski/Boyes.

[Stephane Richer]

Boyes, Wolski! Accepting Redden without positional requirement= funny farm:woohoo: