Foster and Rice are pretty close, plus if Foster gets banged up, I don't think Texans would hesitate to play Tate more.
Nicks (base of 5th proximal phalanx fracture) has less injury risk than Austin (bad hamstring) .
So I would keep Rice + Nicks.
Keeper league and Im off to a great start. The one team that's off to a better start than me just offered this deal.....
His Foster and Austin for my Rice and Nicks.
I am thinking it might be a bit too much to give up considering Rice should have been the 2nd or 3rd off the board compared to Foster going 1st, while Nicks would go WAY ahead of Austin....especially in a keeper.
Foster and Rice are pretty close, plus if Foster gets banged up, I don't think Texans would hesitate to play Tate more.
Nicks (base of 5th proximal phalanx fracture) has less injury risk than Austin (bad hamstring) .
So I would keep Rice + Nicks.
Semi-retired
He has now upped it to Foster and Mike Wallace......
I still don't think I like the injury risk but what do you guys think?
I think I would keep Rice and Nicks.. Rice has been healthy throughout his career and has put up some really nice numbers.. Foster has been banged up and I don't think I would bet on him in a keeper league..
Rice is 1 year younger then Foster and Nicks is 2 years younger then Wallace.. Yes its not that much, but in football it is huge..
I would keep Rice and Nicks over Foster and Wallace/Austin
Zorro says "vote for Dobber"
Angus is my best friend at dobberhockey..