Reply With QuoteWith the three you drafted earlier, I wouldn't be focusing on Faska.
Rielly would be my choice here over Faulk.
Rielly, Faksa or Faulk? Need response ASAP (drafting, rep!)
Hey lads,
I'm in a bit of a pickle.
I'm rebuilding my keeper team and in terms of prospects on the back end, I have Dougie Hamilton and that's it. My starting D include Campbell, Subban, Wideman and Corvo and would really like to start getting top notch prospects there.
I was fortunate enough to draft 1st 2nd and 3rd overall and took Granlund, Galy and Yakupov. My center's are pretty well stocked for talent, It's just my D I think that needs help.
Remaining from the draft so far that I've notice is
Faulk
Rielly
and Faksa
I know Faksa isn't a defenceman, but noone has drafted him, and I'm wondering if he's worth drafting ahead of Faulk and Rielly...thoughts?
If you had to take Faulk or Rielly which would you take?
G
A
+/-
PIM
PPP
SHP
GWG
SOG
W
GAA
SV%
SHO
Thanks guy! I'll rep where I can
With the three you drafted earlier, I wouldn't be focusing on Faska.
Rielly would be my choice here over Faulk.
Yep, I agree with the hockeyrobot. Reilly should be your pick here.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, SBennett
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Another vote for Rielly.
^ Totally agree!Originally Posted by hockeyrobot
League:Fantrax 18 Team Dynasty, H2H (4C, 8W, 6D, 1G)
Cats:G, A, GWG, PPP, SHP, SOG, H+B, FOW, S, SV%, W, GAA
C: Backstrom,Giroux,MacKinnon,Seguin
W: D.Brown,Hartnell,Hossa,P.Kane
Kesler,Marleau,Perron,Zibanejad
D: Boyle,Del Zotto,Doughty,D.Hamilton,Hedman,Markov
G: Rinne
Bench: Braun,Comeau, Demers,DeHaan,Polak,Stempniak,Wingels --Fleury
Definitely Rielly, he could be special.Hey lads,
I'm in a bit of a pickle.
I'm rebuilding my keeper team and in terms of prospects on the back end, I have Dougie Hamilton and that's it. My starting D include Campbell, Subban, Wideman and Corvo and would really like to start getting top notch prospects there.
I was fortunate enough to draft 1st 2nd and 3rd overall and took Granlund, Galy and Yakupov. My center's are pretty well stocked for talent, It's just my D I think that needs help.
Remaining from the draft so far that I've notice is
Faulk
Rielly
and Faksa
I know Faksa isn't a defenceman, but noone has drafted him, and I'm wondering if he's worth drafting ahead of Faulk and Rielly...thoughts?
If you had to take Faulk or Rielly which would you take?
G
A
+/-
PIM
PPP
SHP
GWG
SOG
W
GAA
SV%
SHO
Thanks guy! I'll rep where I can
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
Just for good measure, another vote for Rielly.
20 Team Dynasty (points per) - G (25, 50 for defense) A (25) PIM (3) PPP (15) SHP (25) OTG (15) GWG (25) HTr (50) SOW (75) HIT (1) BLK (2) W (50) SHO (100) OTL (10) GA (-15) SV (2) Use actual NHL salary
Start 12 F, 6 D, 1G weekly
F: Kucherov, Marchand, Barkov, Gaudreau, Laine, Aho, Dubois, Dadonov, Huberdeau, Trocheck, Bertuzzi, Beauvillier, Khaira, Grigorenko
D: Ekman-Larsson, Yandle, Edler, Pulock, Borowiecki, Weegar, Mike Reilly
G: Andersen, Hart
Farm: Boldy, Beckman, Wise, Mascherin, Kovalenko, Manukyan, Walker, Morozov, Shafigullin, Palmu, Tychonic, Zhuravlyov, Kesselring, Zamula, Lankinen, Sogaard, Ingram, Rybar
I would go with Rielly as well.
So Faulk it is!
Juuust kidding.
Thanks guys, I drafted Reilly.
Just wanted to put it out there that I would have taken Faulk over Reilly all day. Just so it is on the record now.
"My Name Is My Name" ~Marlo
"I'm just a Gangster I suppose and I want my fu***** corners"~ Barksdale
grammar Nazi
Noun
(slang, idiomatic) 1. A person who habitually corrects or criticizes the language usage of others, especially in situations where it is unnecessary, e.g. an informal conversation.
Notes: This behavior is almost always found in people with very low I.Q's, whom have a very low sense of self worth. Impotence is also commonly linked to Grammar Nazi's.
Well you're a bit late to the party now, aren't you
If he's still there next pick he's mine!Well you're a bit late to the party now, aren't you
Posting Permissions