Nash for Marleau and Matthais

[Grover]

Keeper pool
G= 2, A= 1, +/- = 1

Nash for Marleau and Matthais

This trade for next year
I need depth, longer run I get two good players for one Nash is often hurt as well.

I can always ditch Marleau when he gets going.

[Narayan]

you can get more for nash... way more...

he also plays LW which is huge if you have positional requirements

[toewsfan]

Don\'t do it! You would be trading a 50-goal (90 point) a year future hall of famer for a player on the decline who projects in the 70-75 point range (Marleau) and a prospect who is more of a two-way player than pure scorer (Matthias). Your pool format really rewards goal scorers heavily. I\'m sure you can get more.

[kytmagic]

I have to agree with the others especially if you are in a league that counts goals two times more than assists. Nash is worth way more.

[Chicleteur]

I don\'t like this one. Nash is a goal scorer and he\'s gold with your league settings. As the others said, you could get more for him.

[rumrunner]

Another vote for \"stand down\".

With Goal=2 points, Nash is a keeper.

If you are concerned with his injuries, this is something many young players go through, until they get used to, and understand the 82 game grind (plus playoffs).

If you really want to trade him, you should be able to do better.

[Fighting_Emu]

Id really consider not trading him at all. I mean unless someone aproached you with a very nice package Id just hang tight on him. In 1-2 years he will be an absolute monster in your pool and could gsrner a heftier price, but even then- why trade a guy like that?