Offensive D-Men like Whitney are hard to come by. Even though Sakic may retire after next season, he\'ll give you a good one...
I\'d keep Whitney and Sakic...Havlat and Hemsky have too many question marks for my liking
Whitney (Pit) and Sakic for Havlat and Hemsky - pool requires positions, so d is important, but no difference in points scored between forwards and defence. I\'d appreciate any thoughts.
Offensive D-Men like Whitney are hard to come by. Even though Sakic may retire after next season, he\'ll give you a good one...
I\'d keep Whitney and Sakic...Havlat and Hemsky have too many question marks for my liking
Today is the tomorrow I worried about yesterday.
chair007 wrote:
I think Joe has more time left than people think, he just seems to be getting better...and Whitney...well no need to even explain that one...Whitney (Pit) and Sakic for Havlat and Hemsky - pool requires positions, so d is important, but no difference in points scored between forwards and defence. I\'d appreciate any thoughts.
Havlat? An immense talent, and an immense band-aid...Hemsky? Depends on what the Oilers do.. Bottom line...
Sakic/Whitney
Welcome \'Chair\'!
Don\'t do this buddy. You are trading the best defenceman in the NHL, in the next 2 years, for \'bandaid\'! Havlat will not play a full season. Hemsky, who knows? Don\'t do it! You lose! Ok. Let me be more emphatic. DON\'T DO IT!. hmy: Sorry for shouting.
haha, thanks guys... seems like an easy decision in retrospect!
Havlat is very overrated fantasy wise. I\'ve seen china dolls that are less fragile than him.
Stay away unless you can get him far below market value
Havlat is very overrated fantasy wise. I\'ve seen china dolls that are less fragile than him.
Stay away unless you can get him far below market value