Reply With QuoteNucks in 6
Canucks in 6. A hobbled Carter, ineffective Richards. Kings better hope Quick keeps them in this.
12 -Team Yahoo, Points Pool, Keeper (Since 1995): G(1), A(1), PPG(1), SHG(1) GWG(1), W(2), SHO(3). Protect 13 each season.
C (4): Hayes, Bonino, White, Bozak
LW (4): Aho, Huberdeau, K Connor, Gourde
RW (4): Perry, Boeser, Tuch, Zucker
F (1):Labanc
D (4): Barrie, Theodore, Faulk, Shattenkirk
G (1): Lehner
Bench: (C) Kerfoot, (RW) Silfverberg, (LW) Bertuzzi (D) Q Hughes, R Murray, D'Angelo (G) Demko, Markstrom,
Nucks in 6
I pick Van in 5 games
Roster Requirements
(2 C, 2 LW, 2 RW, 3 F, 4 D, 2 G)Totals:25 15 Starters, 10Bench, +4 IR - Head To Head - Weekly Lineups - Stats: PTS ONLY- 1PT/START(G) 2PTS/WIN - 5PTS/SHUTOUT
Record: 17-7-0 (2015-16 Champ)
C: Seguin, Giroux
LW: T.Hall, Panarin
RW: P. Kane, Palmieri
F: Galchenyuk, Domi, Landeskog
D: Subban, Ekman-Larrson, Suter, Vatanen
Bench: T.Hertl, V.Nishushkin, Gallagher, Pulkkinen, Mike Reilly, Korpisalo
Goalies: J.Allen, Lundqvist
Farm Team: Rantanen(RW) Barzal(C) Provorov(D) Nurse(D) Kylington(D)
Follow Me https://twitter.com/#!/MRHOCKEYLOVER87
Vancouver in 6 max.
Yahoo 1 Year Leagues:
G, A, PIM, +/-, PPP, SOG, HIT
W, GAA, SV%, SHO
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G, 4Bn, 1IR
Western Conference Quarterfinals: (1) Vancouver Canucks vs (8) Los Angeles Kings
Pollingggggggggggg
Originally Posted by b0ndon
Not so Quick!
Boom, b0ndon roasted!
" You said you don't give a f*ck about hockey. I've never heard anyone say that before."
Canucks in 6 games. Even as the President's Trophy winner, I think they're flying under the radar so far.
Put down the Haterade. Vancouver will smoke the Kings in 5.
10 Team Limited Keeper (Keep 8) Points Only
SALARY CAP (Player Salaries) League
20 Player Teams = 12 Fwd 6 D 2 G
My team: ???
Not so Quick.
Is this how it's done Bondon?
What does everyone think about the fact that the canucks are the only team from their division that made the playoffs? Since teams from the same division play each other more often, doesn't that suggest their record might be "inflated"?
Whereas a team like St. Louis, who is the top of the central division, had to play more games against more playoff teams (Redwings, blackhawks, and preds).
Thoughts?
12 teams, H2H Points, Limited Keeper League (10th year), 6 keepers. 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 2UTIL, 2G
G (2), A (1), +/- (0.5), PIM (0.2), GWG (1), HAT (2), HIT (0.1), BLK (0.2), PPP (1), SHP (2)
W (3), L (-1), GA (-1.), SV (0.2), SO (2)
Keepers = Barkov, Panarin, Marner, Stone, Josi, Fleury
Maybe Vancouver's dominance of their divisional opponents is the reason none of them made the playoffs?
Good point. It would be interesting to see their record against their divisional opponents though.
12 teams, H2H Points, Limited Keeper League (10th year), 6 keepers. 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 2UTIL, 2G
G (2), A (1), +/- (0.5), PIM (0.2), GWG (1), HAT (2), HIT (0.1), BLK (0.2), PPP (1), SHP (2)
W (3), L (-1), GA (-1.), SV (0.2), SO (2)
Keepers = Barkov, Panarin, Marner, Stone, Josi, Fleury
18-5-1.
You definitely can't argue that they didn't benefit from a strong divisional record but whether it is because their divisional opponents were weaker or because the team got up for those games more is something that you can't tangibly argue. Maybe with a more balanced schedule the Canucks don't win the President's Trophy but what's clear is they are still an elite team and I wouldn't knock them for beating up on weaker opponents. You could even argue that beating up on weaker teams has kept them well rested for playoffs.
Awesome...thanks for your input!
12 teams, H2H Points, Limited Keeper League (10th year), 6 keepers. 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 2UTIL, 2G
G (2), A (1), +/- (0.5), PIM (0.2), GWG (1), HAT (2), HIT (0.1), BLK (0.2), PPP (1), SHP (2)
W (3), L (-1), GA (-1.), SV (0.2), SO (2)
Keepers = Barkov, Panarin, Marner, Stone, Josi, Fleury
i dont think the presidents trophy winning 07-08 detroit red wings minded dominating a weak division on route to a cup win
One day I will quit fantasy hockey, today is not that day.
Posting Permissions
