Kane/Keith for Datsyuk/Markov
Points only keeper league, who would you rather have
Kane and Keith
for my
Datsyuk and Markov
The owner of Kane and Keith really wants Datsyuk. Kane and Keith are the only players I would really want off of his team.
or should I be happy with a Datsyuk for Kane straight across?
14 Team, Keep14 Farm5, 82GP Cap/Position
Skaters: Points only, Goalies 2ptWin/3ptSO
Start: 4C,4LW,4RW,6D,2G
C- Crosby, Zibanejad, Couturier, Zacha, Frost
LW- Marchand, Huberdeau, McTavish, Rackell, Kuzmenko
RW- Konecny, Necas, Caufield, Jarvis, Lafreniere
D- Hughes, Carlson, Werenski, Chychrun, Andersson, Dobson, Weegar
G- Andersen, Merzlikins, Daccord, Jones
Farm- Johnston, Foerster, Tarasov, Hutson, Reinbacher
Picks-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11
In a keeper I'd be happy with Kane for Datsyuk straight across, but even more happy with the trade you mentioned below as Keith >>>>> Markov. If he's the one who is bugging you about Datsyuk though I'd make him give you more than just Kane and he probably will since you have the bargaining power as he is coming to you.
Last edited by PocketRockets05; October 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM.
12 teams h-to-h partial keeper league. Daily line-up changes.
End of the year u keep 1C, 2W, 2D, 1G
Categories: G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, FW, W, GAA, SV%, SHO
Lineup: 2C, 4W, 4D, 2G, 5Bench, 2IR
I'd go for that trade as well. I think Markov could be done in the NHL and with hockey perhaps. I'd probably take Dats over Kane but in this case, the Keith/Markov side seals it for me.
10 Team Yahoo H2H - Keep 5 - G,A,+/-,PPP,PIMS,HITS SOG,GWG/W,GAA,SV%,SO
C: Tavares, Pavelski, Fabbri, Matthews, Rakell,
LW: Landeskog, Sedin, Perron
RW: Kucherov, Oshie, Radulov, Backes
D: Subban, Petry, Gostisbehere, Green, Yandle, Werenski
G: Price, Talbot
Canadian Dad Blog - http://canadiandad.com
Take it and run. Markov is done and Dats is getting old.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote