Big Goalie Trade, HELP!!!

[HOONANUCK]

I have Lundqvist and Quick, I have been ask to trade Lundqvist for the 1st overall pick, Theodore and Foligno. If i do it it will give me 8 picks in the first 4 rounds. SHOULLD I DO IT??????

[Seeds of Grapes]

I have Lundqvist and Quick, I have been ask to trade Lundqvist for the 1st overall pick, Theodore and Foligno. If i do it it will give me 8 picks in the first 4 rounds. SHOULLD I DO IT??????

In a word, NO!

You should be able to leverage either one for a better downgrade at G and a better player than what you would get with a no 1 pick.

Edit - after reading the next comment, Shakedown is right - do not break this tandem up UNLESS (IMO) you get better in return.

[Shake]

I have Lundqvist and Quick, I have been ask to trade Lundqvist for the 1st overall pick, Theodore and Foligno. If i do it it will give me 8 picks in the first 4 rounds. SHOULLD I DO IT??????

You own Lundqvist and Quick. There is IMO no reason to break up this tandem for your team It's the best goalie tandem you can have.

[bondon]

There has to be a reason why you're considering this because I can't think of one so I'm guessing it has something to do with your scoring categories or your keepers?

I have no clue what FT SBLK and SOS are. How many do you keep?

If you can give us a valid reason as to why this kind of deal would benefit your team, then I'd love to hear it.

[fmoriss]

The way I see it:

If I had the first pick overall and could choose between Lundqvist or Yakupov, I'd go with Lundqvist all the way. He's been constant over the years, always in the points leaders and with the Nash addon, maybe Doan too, the Rangers and Lundqvist will win a lot of games. With Quick I think you have the best of it. Yakupov will probably be a star, but Lundqvist is already one.

[HOONANUCK]

Goalies that will be avilable in the draft

loungo or schnieder (dont know which one the owner will drop)
Holtby
Mason
Halak
Neuvirth
Bobrovsky

[HOONANUCK]

There has to be a reason why you're considering this because I can't think of one so I'm guessing it has something to do with your scoring categories or your keepers?

I have no clue what FT SBLK and SOS are. How many do you keep?

If you can give us a valid reason as to why this kind of deal would benefit your team, then I'd love to hear it.

FT = fights
SBLK = Shots Blocked
SOS = Shoutout Saves

[Shake]

Goalies that will be avilable in the draft

loungo or schnieder (dont know which one the owner will drop)
Holtby
Mason
Halak
Neuvirth
Bobrovsky

No.

Your trading away proven top notch strength and getting back risk / question marks or just potential. Keep Lundy and Quick. You should dominate with them. Other deals you can work on, but make this goalie tandem the backbone of your team.

[Call of Doughty]

I have Lundqvist and Quick, I have been ask to trade Lundqvist for the 1st overall pick, Theodore and Foligno. If i do it it will give me 8 picks in the first 4 rounds. SHOULLD I DO IT??????

Regardless of how many draft picks you have or where you are drafting from, don't move Lundy for that bag of rubbish.

If you've been reading this forum, Lundy are Quick are commonly ranked 1 & 2 fantasy wise. Keep that tandem together and move one if and only if you really need to do so.

Status quo would be my vote.

[Seeds of Grapes]

This is silly. I think B0nd0n is right on the mark here. When you trade, you do it for the reason of improving your team objectively. In many cases, it is a call. This is not. There is no legitimate hockey reason to make this deal. Don't do it.

[HOONANUCK]

There has to be a reason why you're considering this because I can't think of one so I'm guessing it has something to do with your scoring categories or your keepers?

I have no clue what FT SBLK and SOS are. How many do you keep?

If you can give us a valid reason as to why this kind of deal would benefit your team, then I'd love to hear it.

My keepers are in my signature.

[HOONANUCK]

Thanks for the help!