Reply With QuoteAdvanced stats are garbage
And so they should. He's good in every way.
Advanced stats are garbage
An interesting opinion that many don't share.
I am just assuming this means that there are a few Swedish prospects who come out badly on advanced metrics so now it's all garbage.
They are literally useless half the time. Advanced stats in hockey are a joke, and I vomit every time somebody tries to apply them to the game. There are way too many factors to take into consideration. It's not baseball.Originally Posted by metaldude26
"Well Player X has a relative corsi of 10 and a GTV of +13 as compared to player Y who has a relative corsi blaH BLAH BLAH"
good thing actual scouts watch guys play and don't rely on garbage statistics to make their decisions
We get it. Math is scary.
Except that's completely untrue. Many scouts and teams use advanced metrics.
Yes and not everything has to be your personal crusade. I literally vomit everytime you express this opinion unprovoked.
Probably the Oilers and Jackets!
Advanced stats tell me that Brad Marchand is a better player to have than Datsyuk
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stati...4+45+46+63+67#
Well advanced stats tell me that the quality of my posts relative to the competition are amazing.
Yes you don't like stats. Okay.
I like stats that mean something. The stats that mean something are Landeskog's +/- relative to teammates and his goal, assist, and shot totals, as well as his TOI. That's it.
Posting Permissions
