Dobber not sure if you want to have all the issues listed in one big thread or separate out the Prospects Guide into its own thread but one thing I noticed off the bat was that Winnipeg appears after Anaheim in the Prospects Guide (I assume because they used to be Atlanta)
UFHP - Y! 12 GMs - 23/8 pro/farm - keep 17 + all farm
G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG, Hits, FW; GS, W, L, GA, GAA, SA, SV, SV%, SHO
C: Backstrom, Crosby, Little, Zetterberg, Rask
LW: Foligno, Ehlers, Skinner, Hartnell, Jokinen, Ladd
RW: Tarasenko, Kessel, Nash, Marner
D: Keith, Karlsson, Klingberg, Werenski, Barrie, Manson
G: Price, Murray, Andersen
Farm:
C: Keller
LW: Fiala, Heinen
RW: Gurianov
D: Sergachev, Beaulieu, Manning, Borowiecki
G: Forsberg, Driedger
I'm really enjoying the guide so far, almost too much...I was reading it on my phone on the subway on the way home from work today and almost missed my stop and ended up in the Bronx
Under San Jose the note that starts:
I get the feeling that with that trade for Burns
is no longer valid, time to rethink that thought Dobber
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Benson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Kovalenko, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie, Daws
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Hanifin, Severson, Nikishin, Andrae
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Benson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Kovalenko, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie, Daws
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Hanifin, Severson, Nikishin, Andrae
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Benson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Kovalenko, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie, Daws
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Hanifin, Severson, Nikishin, Andrae
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Benson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Kovalenko, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie, Daws
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Hanifin, Severson, Nikishin, Andrae
I found another error Dobber...you seem to have Hemsky listed as playing 70 games this coming season, that can't be right can it?
under Jersey:
"I doubt"? or maybe "I don't think"?but I don’t DeBoer will loosen the reins.
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Benson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Kovalenko, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie, Daws
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Hanifin, Severson, Nikishin, Andrae
Not a big error but I'll still post it, why not?
Angus Prime Cut: Wojtek Wolski Grade: Sirloin
It’s hard to imagine that this may be the last shot in an NHL scoring role for the 25-year-old Wolski. After putting up 50 points in his rookie season of 2006-07, Wolski has only broken the mark once (65 points combined between Colorado and Phoenix in 2010-11).
End of statement should say 2009-2010 and not 2010-2011.
Note about Richards/Eriksson in the Dallas section:
Eriksson was on the ice for 59 of Brad Richards’ 77 points (76.6%). Richards was on the ice for 53 of Eriksson’s 71 points (74.6%). In other words, even though the difference was slight, Richards needed Eriksson more than Eriksson needed Richards.
Two items:
1. Eriksson had 73pts in 2010-2011.
2. In fairness (to include injury) you need to remove any of Eriksson's production in which Brad Richards did not play. That is an 8pt* in 10game stretch from Feb.14th - March 8th.
B.Richards on for 53 of Eriksson's 65pts* would be 81.5%.
As a comparison:
Daniel Sedin missed a big chunk of time in 2009-2010.
Henrik was probably on for 90% of Daniel's points.
But due to injury, Daniel may have only been on for 60% of Henrik's points.
This circumstance would skew an interpretation of "who needs who".
*Take injury games into account - both ways.
Last edited by Pengwin7; August 1, 2011 at 11:51 PM.