Nash for Grabner and MPS

[sens41]

Was just offered Garbner and MPS for Nash, leaning towards no just because I want to see what Carter and him can do together, but I like MPS situation in Edmonton and who know what Grabner will do this up coming season.

Any thoughts???

[MT319]

MPS is mid 60's to high 60's talent and reeks too much of beta male for my liking, Grabner has good north-south speed and decent shooting ability, but he will not be better than any of Tavares, Neiderreiter, or Okposo in NYI and he is like low 60's talent. Nash is considerably better than either of these two so don't even waste your time

[Shake]

Was just offered Garbner and MPS for Nash, leaning towards no just because I want to see what Carter and him can do together, but I like MPS situation in Edmonton and who know what Grabner will do this up coming season.

Any thoughts???

We don't know for sure what Grabner and MPS will consistently produce , we do know however what Nash will do on a consistent basis. Your gonna wanna stick with Nash.

[bondon]

We don't know for sure what Grabner and MPS will consistently produce , we do know however what Nash will do on a consistent basis. Your gonna wanna stick with Nash.

Yep, I think Shake put it perfectly.

Don't like the fact that you're giving up the best player in the deal either.

[robmyatt]

Seems like a lot of poolies are trying to sell Grabner while his stock is high. Buyer beware. He's good, but beware of over paying.

[A Watch]

MPS is good but his upside is a shade less than Nash is producing in an average year IMO. Grabner is a treat to watch but not a 70 point player. Nash is a multi cat guy you want to keep that has even more potential with the next season. Carter and Wiz should give him a nice little boost so hold onto him.