levi trade in 14t dynasty

[caochad]

Is this too much for too little for the tanking team


side a(tanking)
Ek
Talbot
2nd

Side B(1st place has Oettinger as 1A clear favorite to win this year)
Levi
1st

[joe jones]

if i were tanking i would take levi/1st for that. I don't think it is too much either way.

[caochad]

if i were tanking i would take levi/1st for that. I don't think it is too much either way.

That's what I figured just wasn't sure how far Ek had risen in dynasty value and the fact that its very likely a minimal pick upgrade

[Belexus75]

that will be a very late first rounder but its good value. It will really depend on how Levi develops but if he is middle of the pack G down the road, its clear win to get him.

[stevegamer]

That trade is fine. The contending team wants Ek & a currently reliable goalie.

You've got to realize the early second rounder for a late first isn't a huge drop.

[caochad]

That trade is fine. The contending team wants Ek & a currently reliable goalie.

You've got to realize the early second rounder for a late first isn't a huge drop.

no i get that

that's the issue with it that is part of the question is whether the tanking team should do it for the negligible 1st

[Belexus75]

no i get that

that's the issue with it that is part of the question is whether the tanking team should do it for the negligible 1st

yes thats ok but not if you give up a pick 2-3 picks away...if he is first and you are last those picks will be side by side...so maybe try countering with 3rd rounder going back?

[stevegamer]

no i get that

that's the issue with it that is part of the question is whether the tanking team should do it for the negligible 1st

Levi > Talbot for any team not currently contending. I'd expect Levi to be more valuable as soon as next year. I look at Ek as the price to get Levi. The pick upgrade is a small thing.