Morgan Rielly or Justin Schultz in league in my sig? Drafted Schultz mainly due to the potential of PP1, but Morgan is an FA.
Also for the same league, Dano, Nichushkin, Stewart, or Belesky? Again, drafted Dano due to potential of being 1LW, rest are FAs
I prefer Rielly over Schultz but perhaps the move here is to give Schultz a good couple of months to see if that Edmonton power play clicks. I'm not optimistic he'll be the benefactor if/when it does but you never know. It's H2H so having a somewhat lesser 4th D for a couple of months won't kill you even if it means you miss out on Rielly cracking the 30-point mark because someone else got to him first.
I think Nichushkin is the guy with the best potential to go off here but again, it's H2H so you can be patient and wait things out to see who emerges.
Categories are in my sig
I've been debating about trading Malkin for a while now. Haven't had him in my last two playoffs due to injury. Is now the time to deal him that he has the opportunity to play with Kessel? Or do I hold on to him because he might get back to 100 points. I was thinking if I do trade him I target a LW as I've lost some duo eligibility on some players (Staal and Kucherov for example)
Hi Steve, I've been having a lot of discussions about the Dallas Stars for this upcoming season, especially about the projections for Jason Spezza. Some people were saying he was "unlucky" last year, shooting 8.3% when his career average was 13.4%. He also had a very low IPP last season, his lowest in 5 years.
Most people are expecting a bounce back this season and are projecting him to get north of 70 points (he got 17G - 45A = 62 PTS last year). Me, I don't buy it, I think at best, he will reach the same totals as last year. First, his role won't really change (2C with PP1 ice time). He's also 32 now and seems to be trending downward. So what do you think?
Yahoo! 1 year league, 9 teams, Points only [G (3pts), A (2pts), PPP (1pt), Hits (0.1pt) *** W (4pts), Goals Against (-2pts), SV (0.2pt), SO (3pms)
C: McDavid, Couturier, Kopitar, D.Strome
LW: Guentzel, Connor, Miller, Kaprizov
RW: Stamkos, Stone, Teravainen, Tatar
D: Dahlin, Theodore, Andersson, Dumba
G: Shersterkin, Talbot
I'm inclined to agree that he was a bit unfortunate at even strength both shooting a low percentage and failing to get in on the average piece of the pie when goals were scored with him out there. His per-60 scoring at evens fell to below 2.00 for the first time in five seasons (I'm not counting 2013 where he only played five games) and that's likely the result of this dip in IPP. His primary assists also fell to half their usual rate, which if it keeps up suggests there is a serious decline here so that's worth monitoring.
The big thing for me is that in watching the Stars last season Spezza didn't look noticeably diminished or in-decline. He has the sort of skills/vision that tend to age very well. With improved linemates and maybe an improved defense the Stars should offer a better supporting cast to prop Spezza up even if he is on the way down.
The flip side is that Spezza is an injury concern. Can he play another full 82 games? Is 70 more reasonable? What about 75? Have to consider the injuries and not just the ones that cost games but the ones that linger and cost effectiveness.
He's a part of that lethal Stars power play so he doesn't have to produce much at even strength to be fantasy relevant. I have him for mid-60s production because the injury concerns are real. His luck could improve as far as IPP goes but still wind up with the same results as last season if he skates 10 fewer games.
Hi Steve,
In a keeper league, points only, no position who do you prefer this year and for the next 3 years: Stepan, Nyquist, Palat and Mark Stone.
Thanks
Hello Steve,
What is a reasonable price to pay for MacDavid in a Dynasty league with G, A, +/-, PPP, PIM, FW, HITS and Blocks.
Guy is asking for Tavares plus Subban and offering MacDavid and Shattenkirk
Thanks
I'd say that's a fairly reasonable price to pay. Personally, I wouldn't go this far. I think McDavid is the best prospect since Crosby but Tavares was once the best prospect since Crosby and we probably haven't seen the best from him yet. You've also got Subban headed out and he absolutely crushes with these categories. So you're giving up a top-five forward and a top-two defenseman for maybe the #1 forward in a year or two plus the #10-or-so defenseman. Shattenkirk is a beauty but he doesn't touch the peripherals the way Subban does.
I think you've got to be very confident that McDavid gets to 100 points by next season and that Tavares is capped out at 90 to make this worth your while. I wouldn't pay this much but conversely if I were selling McDavid I'd need a guy like Tavares coming back, no question.
For the league in my sig. if I can get Klingberg for Galchenyuk, should I do it?
18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.
Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G
3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA
Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras
Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk
Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins
2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!
Hi Steve,
I know that they are all 55-65 points guys, but could you give me a ranking regarding next year and for the next 3 years.
Having a hard time myself to decide, your opinion will be much appreciated.
Thanks