Originally Posted by
horrorfan
Very good discussion.
FHG, one thing I am curious about is, as mentioned by Pengwin above, that some categories are more easily found later in the draft, is this incorporated in the FHG values? That is, are the more difficult, offensive categories given more 'weight' than peripheral categories such as PIM/Hits?
I haven't checked recently but I believe guys like Ott/Clarkson have quite high (relative) FHG due to extreme numbers in peripherals, and perhaps that is given too much importance (my opinion) compared to more offensive categories. Any thoughts on this? Perhaps a comparison with more offensive/less gritty players could be worthwhile?