Gamble on Hardesty over F Jax?

[lusshouse]

Cleveland plays a terrible DEF in Indy against the run, and Richardson has seen limited practice up until Friday, and might start with a jacket on. But clearly this isn't set in stone yet.

Would you start Hardesty that I picked up on waivers ahead of Fred Jackson in a standard 12-team league, non-PPR.

Jackson also faces a weak DEF against the run with the Titans, but he's clearly in a RBBC situation with Spiller actually getting slightly more touches now that both are healthy.


William Powell (ARI) will be clear-cut #1 RB this week for Arizona, but faces a tough DEF in Minny. He's my third and final option and I don't think he's relevant at all.

[One87]

Cleveland plays a terrible DEF in Indy against the run, and Richardson has seen limited practice up until Friday, and might start with a jacket on. But clearly this isn't set in stone yet.

Would you start Hardesty that I picked up on waivers ahead of Fred Jackson in a standard 12-team league, non-PPR.

Jackson also faces a weak DEF against the run with the Titans, but he's clearly in a RBBC situation with Spiller actually getting slightly more touches now that both are healthy.


William Powell (ARI) will be clear-cut #1 RB this week for Arizona, but faces a tough DEF in Minny. He's my third and final option and I don't think he's relevant at all.

If you can follow matters leading up to kickoff, to make sure Richardson is playing, which appears to be the case now, I would do that before deciding out right. If Richardson is for sure out, go with Hardesty. If things stay as they are now - Richardson playing - i'd go Jackson. To safeguard any last minute mishap from roster roulette, i'd probably have Jackson rostered right now as a starter. It would be a shame for you to have MH in there and then you can't get to a computer and quickly insert Jackson.