Please Evaluate - Halak, McDonagh, Strom for Bishop, Lindholm, Neal

[Steeler]

I'm considering a trade which is rooted (rightfully or not) for my desire to arguably upgrade Halak for Bishop. I see Bishop as less of an injury risk but I also have Vasilevskiy as a back-up. Both are on good teams. In order to make this happen, I have to provide the other GM (Ranger fan) with McDonagh. I think I might be able to get the following deal done.

My Halak, McDonagh, Strome for his Bishop, Lindholm, Neal

I am giving up potentially good +/- players but I am mitigating that by getting some back. My league counts the following scoring categories - G, A, PIM, +/-, Hits, Blks for skaters and Wins, Save %, and GAA for goalies.

Do you guys like one side of this deal better or is this pretty even and simply up to the preference of each GM?

[rangerfan2430]

I think it's pretty even. I don't think McDonagh will be a good fantasy defender while Yandle is in town and I like that you have Vasilevsky.

[Steeler]

How do you guys see these components?

Halak < Bishop
McDonagh = Lindholm
Strome > Neal

All being very close though?

[rangerfan2430]

That's pretty much what I was thinking

[Steeler]

Thanks....rep for the input