This is getting ridiculous - Stone now only needs 29 points in his final 28 games to reach 70! Time to officially reverse the reverse jinx I set into motion!
Whatever happens, this thread sure has been a fun roller coaster.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
Had the pleasure of watching a few games in Ottawa this year. Stone is always creating, and was getting snake bitten.
A point a game to hit 70 is very possible. Anyone who doubts his ability to be a consistent 70 point guy should watch some Sens games.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
If there is one thing learned in my short time here, every thread about a Sens player or the team itself is basically the same argument with the same characters and personalities taking the same stances and arguing the same points over and over.
Lots of good info and It seems fun, but you guys must get tired of the repetition sometimes.
It's always the same guys because they hate how I am always right...
No idea if you're right, I'm new. You do make great points about the Sens and others make great counterpoints when they debate with you. It just seems like it's the same debate over and over whether its this thread, the Karlsson Hart trophy debate, or the Phaneuf trade being good (or bad) for Ottawa.
Sens team or sens player, different day, same characters, same debate. It's funny, but also boring.
"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen." - Sterling Archer
"Don't spray that urine on my sons window. If you want a dollar for doing nothing, walk to Canada." - Malory Archer
“Anyone who thinks the pen is mightier than the sword has not been stabbed with both.” - Lemony Snicket
10th year Keeper League, Fantrax
14 teams, H2H, keep 10, daily starts
G (3), A (2), +/- (1), PIM (0.1), PPP (1), FOW (0.1), FOL (-0.1), BLK (0.5), HAT (3), W (5), SO (3), SV (0.1), GA (-0.5)
C (3) - Schmaltz (LW, RW), Mercer (RW), Norris (IR), Domi (LW), T. Johnson (RW), Nosek (LW)
LW (3) - Keller (RW), Hagel, McCann (C), Zacha (LW), Kubalik (RW), N. Foligno (IR)
RW (3) - Fiala (LW), Vilardi (C), Ehlers (LW), Kakko
D (4) - Theodore, Orlov, Grzelcyk, T. van Riemsdyk, Clifton, Skjei, Weegar
Util (1)
G (1) - Montembault, Allen, Halak
Plus he missed two games because of suspension this season, so if he gets 68 or 69 then I'm claiming the win
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
I was just trying to be funny
but I did mean over an 82 game season. Whenever I make a prediction that's what I mean. Why would I predict 70 of he only was going to play 72 for example.
But it still if he gets 68 or so I don't care that I lost the prediction since your theory would be debunked anyway. Well that theory is probably already debunked since he's on pace for 60 some at the minimum. So technically I didn't lose anything in regards to he arguments with you.
I'm glad to see Stoner's pulled it together again. Even more impressive given that Turdis has fallen off the face of the earth.