Very solid commentary on Eberle right there. After his big 11-12 season, many thought he'd turn into a PPG+ guy. Not the case. Anyone who took a closer look at his highly inflated shooting percentage should have seen that. Eberle as a 65-75 point guys is more than fair.
__________________________________________________ __________________
UHL Dynasty St. Louis Blues
...playoffs, how the eff did I make the playoffs?
UDL Western Kings
...oh boy... this build is gonna be a while...
Was just kind of a more general statement. Eberle and Giroux both have very comparable multi-cat numbers. Only real difference is about 30 PIMs and 40 hits so my range and discrepancy was more geared towards point potential. Basically re-iterating that neither Eberle or Drouin (or Giroux) really carry multi-cat value.
And I do appreciate that... I wasn't one of those people cause my league doesn't include those categories. I usually find myself in Fantasy Stat pergatory with our league's unique scoring systems.
I do wish we had Hits a/o SOG and ditched GWG(Which I feel is a rediculous and randomly useless stat).
But alas we don't and I'm forced to remain stuck in between Points Only and Multi-Cat
Any idea what I could call my league? SO that I can feel included?
__________________________________________________ __________________
UHL Dynasty St. Louis Blues
...playoffs, how the eff did I make the playoffs?
UDL Western Kings
...oh boy... this build is gonna be a while...
Points heavy, with +/-, PIMs, and scoring bonuses? I usually don't call my league anything, just say league in sig.
Ok. Bastardized league in sig! ? !
Lol
Tough one here.. If I had to choose though I would take Drouin.. Very tough, I would almost ask for a pick to come along with Drouin..
Zorro says "vote for Dobber"
Angus is my best friend at dobberhockey..
What if DROUIN doesn't make team, can your team handle it or will it hurt to much. I think he makes team. Just saying. It could happen.
12 team, H2H points, limited keepers
allowed 6 keeper players(PLAYER DRAFTED IN RDS 1-8 NOT ABLE TO BE KEEPER)
Daily starts
16 man roster plus 1 IR
start 6 forwards,4 d, 2 goalies
pts: G=3, A=2, DA=3, DG=5, +/-=1 GWG=1, OTG=2, OTA=1, PPG=2, PPA=1, SHG=3, SHA=1, HT=3, SHOOTOUT GOAL=1
BLKS=.25, HITS=.25, MAJ=2
Goalie pts: WINS=5, SAVES=.20, GA=-1, SO=3
SHOG SAVE=.50, SHOL=2
forwards: M.TKACHUK(k),MARCHAND(k),SCHEIFELE(k)
BENN, GAUDREAU*, COUTURIER*
d: M.RIELLY(k), JOSI*, MCAVOY*, ELLIS
goalies :TALBOT* DEMKO MAF
(k)=keeper
*= no keeper eligibility
bencH: KOPITAR* R. GRAVES ROBERTSON KREJCI
IR E.PETTERSSON(k)
this is one of those threads we will come back to in a few years and say "holy crap i can't believe so many people took player X over player Y".
so for that exact reason, i am not going to pick a side
i will say this:
at WORST, with drouin's skill set, you would think he's a lock for at least 45-50 points at worst. so a decent 2nd liner that chips in on the pp every now and then. at best, drouin is a ppg+ player...so lets say 80-85 points.
so if eberle is considered a 65-75 point guy...would you risk 15 or so points downside in order to potentially get a player who is 10 points better? if i am a top contender and i need the points and consistency now, i take eberle. if i am rebuilding, heck even if i am in the middle of the pack i'd take drouin. the potential is almost too good to pass up, and for elite prospects like drouin you almost have to take that risk.
Pretty sure I could nab a 50 point player in the draft. So really I'd be out 15 points hypothetically. So no...not crippling.
So you kinda rook a side without taking a side. In you opinion...as a contender I should take Eberle and leave the risk to the mid to bottom pack
if you can get a 50pt guy to replace drouin in case he gets sent down, then you are looking at a potential 15-25 pt drop in production from that roster spot. if you can afford to lose that in hopes that drouin will someday be a ppg player then do it. if every point is crucial and you are afraid that downgrading eberle to that 50pt guy could cost you the championship, don't do it.