Death, taxes and a spring time Sharks Choke session.
This is why Anze Kopitar is the second most valuable forward in the league.
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
10 team, head-to-head, multi-cat, keep-12 keeper league. CATS: G,A,+/-,PPP,PIM,SOG,HITS BS,SHP, W,SV,SV%,GAA,SO Daily rosters of 6F, 4D, 2 Flex, 2G
F: Crosby, Hall, Pacioretty, Hartnell, Neal, Nugent-Hopkins, Callahan, Dubinsky, Hossa, Huberdeau, Abdelkader, Bjugstad (IR)
D: Karlsson, Hedman, Muzzin, Savard, Streit (IR)
G: Lundqvist, Quick, Condon
Because he carried his team from a three game deficit to a series win.
Amazing defense against one of the league's most dynamic top-lines.
Big goals every game.
Duh?
it's one playoff series. there have been much better playoff performances, doesnt mean they are now the most valuable player in the league. if you are talking about conne smythe, the kings have a long way to go first...at this point sure he's a potential candidate, but there are still 3 more series left to be played.
I said that this series was further evidence of why Kopitar is so damn good.
I wouldn't take another forward in the league over him (ex. Crosby)for a playoff series if I was doing a fresh draft.
My statement said that this series supported my existing thoughts, it didn't provide the basis for them.
Kopitar is so undervalued around the league it makes my head spin.
how can he be undervalued when he was just nominated for the selke? i would take toews over kopitar in playoffs, but can't really go wrong with either...
your posts in this thread:
"This is why Anze Kopitar is the second most valuable forward in the league."
"Because he carried his team from a three game deficit to a series win.
Amazing defense against one of the league's most dynamic top-lines.
Big goals every game.
Duh?"
you then said:
"My statement said that this series supported my existing thoughts, it didn't provide the basis for them."
go on, explain how us readers were supposed to derive from your first two statements that they were supporting arguements for your existing thoughts.
if i'm in grade 4, it's quite clear you're still in daddy's ballsack, swimming around with your siblings.