Byfuglien, Niemi, Neal, Pavelski, Nyquist, Barkov, and to be honest I would rather keep a 2nd G or if that fails a 2nd D. But if the options really suck, then I would go Galchenyuk
Welcome to the forum!
We are only able to have 7 Keepers. I have a good idea of my top 8-9, but I'm torn between between Nyquist and Barkov. Gally is also a great prospect.
Also, I know Byfuglien will be my only D keeper, so I'm not going to post the rest of my D core.
C - Bergeron
C - Pavelski
C - Galchenyuk
C - Barkov
LW - Skinner
LW - Nyquist
LW - Hartnell
RW - Neal
RW - Oshie
RW - Parenteau
D - Byfuglien
G - Niemi
14 Team | Keep 5 | H2H Weekly Lock
Start: 2 x C, LW, RW | 4 x D | 1 x G
Scoring System:
+/- (0.5), G (3), A (2), PIM (0.25), PPG (1), PPA (1), SHG (2), ShG (1), BLK (0.1), HIT (0.1), GWG (1), HT (2)
W (5), SHO (3), S (0.2), GA (-1), ShSv (0.2)
Byfuglien, Niemi, Neal, Pavelski, Nyquist, Barkov, and to be honest I would rather keep a 2nd G or if that fails a 2nd D. But if the options really suck, then I would go Galchenyuk
Welcome to the forum!
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
No love for Oshie either eh.
Too much depth in St. Louis?
14 Team | Keep 5 | H2H Weekly Lock
Start: 2 x C, LW, RW | 4 x D | 1 x G
Scoring System:
+/- (0.5), G (3), A (2), PIM (0.25), PPG (1), PPA (1), SHG (2), ShG (1), BLK (0.1), HIT (0.1), GWG (1), HT (2)
W (5), SHO (3), S (0.2), GA (-1), ShSv (0.2)
Maybe, but he's also only 21 years old and the fact he has put up 63 pts and a pace for almost that again this year is impressive. He's also escaped missing any serious time in 3 of his 4 seasons. And now it looks like he will either be riding with at least one of E. Staal or Lindholm going forward, which is a nice situation to be in. Considering at the very least you are getting a guy that takes 4 shots per game and is capable of getting 60 pts, with a ceiling of 75+, I don't see how you can't take him.
Injury concerns don't seem to bother you with Malkin. Why would they bother you with Skinner who is still young and developing, and is less risk (as in, if he DOES get injured, he's easier to replace than an elite like Malkin)