Wow.
What vitriol.
He is not a terrible GM, far from it. How did that change from when he won GM of the year?
He planned this team to peak a couple of years ago, and it did. He helped get them within a game of the Stanley Cup. No, he is not a miraculous GM that manages to keep their team in contention forever... But few are: Detroit and NJ from yesteryear, Chicago now (possibly Pitt or Boston if you feel especially generous).
He inherited a team with terrible terrible prospects, and after a couple of years of bad drafting has formed quite the reasonable pipeline. He has three cheap young goalies competing for the number one spot. Markstrom was once the most hyped goalie prospect since Price, and it is certainly too early to give up on him when there are only 4 NHL starters under 26. Lack has done exceptionally well this year in a small sample size, and did well in the AHL and SEL. Eriksson put up ridiculous numbers in the SEL, and has been one of the better goalies in the AHL since the new year.
Getting out of that contract (especially if it was mandated by ownership) is something to commend. Especially when shoring up your team's centre depth and securing a prospect like Markstrom. Luongo has been a league average goalie over the past couple of years and this gives them a lot more flexibility in the years to come.
I don't see how trading a league average goaltender pushing 35 with a cap hit over 5 million (Vancouver doesn't care about actual salary near as much as it does about Cap) for that type of return is atrocious. The process to get there was not pretty, but the result wasn't bad. For those questioning the process, we have no idea what actually happened in any of these scenarios, or how much the ownership pulled the strings.
Even the Schneider trade wasn't bad. Horvat is a great prospect, and will serve the Canucks well in the future. I actually think one of his worse moves was signing the Sedin's to their extensions early this year during a hot steak.
Overall, this is a team that was built to peak in 2011-2013. They were smart enough to realize that, and now their prospects for 2015 looks pretty good. A terrible GM (ahem, Calgary, ahem) would have added rentals and ignored the need to rebuild. A terrible GM wouldn't have gotten good value for current players or restocked through the draft or just bunged up all the draft picks (ahem, Edmonton, ahem) leading to a decade of rebuilding. All signs point to a better future than that, even if Gillis won't be there for it. Give him Kudos for not falling into the trap of self-preservation and blindness that usually hits GMs in his spot.
Please do tell me how he ranks in the bottom third of GMs. How many in his company took a good core and guided it to Stanley Cup finals. If they had some success, how many of those other terrible GMs were able to restock the team's young talent like Gillis has (Lack, Eriksson, Tanev, Corrado, Stanton were all steals or young UFA signings and he has the first round talent of Jensen, Shinkaruk, Horvat, Markstrom as well).
Is he a great, top 5 GM? No, probably not.
Is he in the bottom third? No, I don't think so.